DAVID BIANCULLI

Founder / Editor

ERIC GOULD

Associate Editor

LINDA DONOVAN

Assistant Editor

Contributors

ALEX STRACHAN

MIKE HUGHES

KIM AKASS

MONIQUE NAZARETH

ROGER CATLIN

GARY EDGERTON

TOM BRINKMOELLER

GERALD JORDAN

NOEL HOLSTON

 
 
 
 
 
Mystery and Intrigue on BBC America's Unpredictable 'Undercover'
November 16, 2016  | By David Hinckley  | 6 comments
 

It isn’t until the last minute of the first episode of BBC America’s latest drama that many viewers will suddenly get why the show is called Undercover.

They also may realize at that moment that the subsequent five episodes of Undercover, which launches Wednesday at 8 p.m. ET, may take a very different path from where it seemed to be heading.  

The first hour focuses on Maya Cobbina (Sophie Okonedo, top), a British lawyer who for 20 years has been battling to save a man wrongfully convicted of murder.

Rudy Jones (Dennis Haysbert, right) is an American, and when we join the story, he is on Death Row in Louisiana, two hours from a lethal injection.

Maya, an activist who has poured her life into this case, is so shaken by its apparent outcome that at the moment Jones is to be given the injection, she walks into a deserted field and has a sympathy seizure, replicating death throes.

Then, however, she’s tracked down by a frantic policeman, telling her the execution was botched. Maya flies into a screaming rage, demanding that Jones be unhooked and taken to a hospital for treatment.

He is and she returns to London, where she has a rather different and seemingly less intense life. While she’s still a defense attorney, she lives a seemingly normal domestic life with her adoring husband Nick Johnson (Adrian Lester, top) and their three surprisingly well-mannered and attentive teenage children.

Two things do happen, however, after she gets home.

First, she’s pressed to become the director of public prosecutions, which would put her on the other side of the courtroom from the defense table for the first time in her career.

Second, Nick has a seemingly random visit from a man who says he found Nick’s dog wandering loose.

The significance of these events doesn’t necessarily fall in the order the viewer might suspect.

Keeping the Jones case alive – and keeping Jones alive – clearly has deep emotional resonance for Maya, and ironically, it helps push her toward accepting the prosecution job. Turns out the next prosecutor may have a new witness in a cold case that has haunted her for 30 years.

The random man, meanwhile, isn’t random. He’s an old acquaintance of Nick’s, and he’s come to call in a card Nick played 20 years earlier when he married Maya.

Nick tries to brush him off and send him away, which we know isn’t happening. We also know the fallout for Maya, and probably the family, will be devastating.

Undercover builds its tension at a deliberate pace. It allows Maya plenty of time to vent her outrage and sorrow over the Jones case, for instance, while hinting that the activists who have rallied around him have become a different sort of family for her.

Subsequent episodes spend considerable time on larger legal and moral questions, like who are bad guys and who are good guys and why.

Okonedo is terrific through all this, and Lester captures Nick’s inner conflict. Tamara Lawrence, Daniel Ezra and Shannon Hayes are solid as the children, and Derek Riddle gives dimension to the non-mystery man.

Written by Peter Moffat and directed by James Hawes, Undercover has an ambitious agenda. It slides the legal and justice systems into moral gray areas, with no simple way out.

Light drama it’s not, good drama it is.

 
 
 
 
 
Leave a Comment: (No HTML, 1000 chars max)
 
 Name (required)
 
 Email (required) (will not be published)
 
SSTRV
Type in the verification word shown on the image.
 
 
 Page: 1 of 1  | Go to page: 
6 Comments
 
 
We will give you the best top-quality cutting tools products based on your specific requirements with our technical R&D personnel. We will 100% supports your carbide inserts on whole development., welcome to our website to learn more about carbide inserts:https://www.estoolcarbide.com
Mar 7, 2024   |  Reply
 
 
Over 10 years of experience in the research and manufacturing of cutting tool products, Estool had established the best internal management systems. We are engaged to provide top-quality cutting tool insert solutions to our valued customers, both local and international., welcome to our website to learn more about carbide inserts:https://www.estoolcarbide.com
Feb 28, 2024   |  Reply
 
 
We carry a full stock of carbide inserts for turning, milling, threading, drilling and grooving, with competitive lead time within 3 working days for standard type., welcome to our website to learn more about carbide inserts:https://www.estoolcarbide.com
Jan 29, 2024   |  Reply
 
 
Paul Harris
I have not seen 6th episode, but any lawyer who has practiced at the bar in a state for more than 3 years and is in good standing may apply to appear before SCOTUS, I imagine since she has represented Rudy for 20 years this would apply here.
Nov 18, 2016   |  Reply
 
Zeke Black
When you get to #6, would you post comment? I would love to know if the process even resembles...I felt stung by the portrayal of the highly honored Court.
Nov 19, 2016
 
 
 
Zeke Black
Yes, but by the 6th episode, she has appealed to the SCOTUS-- and there is a very specific subset of US Attys that are approved for that, not a casual outing.
Only pointing out that portraying the misuse of our Court can ruin plotline.
Nov 18, 2016   |  Reply
 
 
Zeke Black
Be warned. Having seen this broadcast originally on UK BBC, it completely misrepresents the Supreme Court of the US. Makes it look like a small town council, in a big building.
So many holes in the story suspend beyond fiction. How is she (not US certified advocate) able to litigate at SCOTUS? Where are the usual Anti-Death Penalty crowds? No one in the US cares?
Perhaps those who like the marital intrigue will forgive the ignorance of our legal system, but it ruined it for me.
Nov 16, 2016   |  Reply
 
Paul Harris
She is not appealing to the us supreme court but rather the supreme court of Louisiana which is who would hear an appeal as the state is executing the prisoner not the Federal Government, the last person to be executed by the federal government was Timonty Mcviegh for the Oklahoma bombings.
Nov 18, 2016
 
 
 
 
 Page: 1 of 1  | Go to page: