DAVID BIANCULLI

Founder / Editor

ERIC GOULD

Associate Editor

LINDA DONOVAN

Assistant Editor

Contributors

ALEX STRACHAN

MIKE HUGHES

KIM AKASS

MONIQUE NAZARETH

ROGER CATLIN

GARY EDGERTON

TOM BRINKMOELLER

GERALD JORDAN

NOEL HOLSTON

 
 
 
 
 
Maude's Dilemma Revisited
November 21, 2012  | By Noel Holston  | 25 comments
 

Forty years ago this week, Maude Findlay, a sitcom character played by Beatrice Arthur, had found herself unintentionally pregnant at age 47 and was agonizing over whether she should have an abortion, newly legal in her home state, New York. Well, not exactly agonizing. More like obsessing. Maude was, after all, a Norman Lear comedy, the first spin-off of his taboo-shattering All in the Family. Finding humor, whether rash or rueful, in hot-button social issues was already established as a hallmark of both.

The two-part “Maude’s Dilemma” episode — which originally aired Nov. 14 and 21, 1972 — has no shortage of cheeky repartee.

"Look, there’s only one sensible way out of this," says Maude’s daughter Carol (Adrienne Barbeau), a divorcee with an eight-year-old son. "You don’t have to have that baby."

"Well, what will I do?" Maude fires back. "Trade it for a volleyball on Let’s Make a Deal?"

To her neighbor Vivian (Rue McClanahan), Maude bemoans the prospect of living "in a house where an uncle is about to inherit his nephew’s potty seat."

It’s hard to imagine laugh lines that flip about abortion in a prime-time entertainment show today — or straight lines as unequivocal as Carol’s advice to her perplexed mother: "We’re free, and we finally have the right to decide what we can do with our own bodies," she says.

"Maude’s Dilemma" concludes with Maude and her similarly middle-aged husband, Walter (Bill Macy), embracing and tearfully deciding that they’re too old to be having a child. "For you, Maude, for me, in the privacy of our own lives, you’re doing the right thing," he says.

All’s well that ends well?

Yeah, right. If anyone needs to be reminded where we are as a society regarding this issue now, check out Part 2 of the "Maude’s Dilemma" episode on YouTube, and then look at the "All Comments section below the video file. Third from the top (at the time of this posting) you’ll find: "Hope all the baby killers get cancer and/or Alzheimer's!!!"

Maude’s most famous episode — or infamous, depending on your point of view — actually aired without creating a huge stir in November 1972. Abortion had only recently been legalized in New York, and Roe v. Wade, the 7-to-2 U.S. Supreme Court decision that made the procedure legal nationally, was still two months away. When CBS re-aired the episode in the summer, after Roe v. Wade became law, more than 30 of its affiliated stations declined to carry it because of protests by anti-abortion viewers. Despite the affiliate defections — and almost certainly with unintended help from the protesters — the rerun attracted 65 million viewers.

What’s most surprising about “Maude’s Dilemma” upon re-watching it now is not its glib jokes but, rather, its presumption that legalization in New York had settled the issue. Writer Susan Harris, who later created The Golden Girls for Arthur and McClanahan, didn’t anticipate the ferocious anti-abortion backlash that would develop in the wake of Roe. Any rights that "the unborn" might have are not part of the discussions. Indeed, the term "fetus" is never heard. Maude and Carol and Walter and Vivian all speak of "the baby" she’s carrying, but only as an object or appendage. The concerns are entirely for Maude — her age, her health, her state of mind, her life expectations.

"Mother, listen to me," Carol says. "It’s a simple operation now. When you were growing up, it was illegal and it was dangerous and it was sinister, and you’ve never gotten over that. You tell me that’s not true."

"You’re right," Maude concedes. "I’ve never gotten over it."

"It’s not your fault," Carol says. "When you were young, abortion was a dirty word. It’s not now."

Forty years later, more than 50 million women and girls have individually exercised the legal right to choose abortion. Clinics that perform abortions have been bombed. Doctors who perform abortions have been murdered. Political candidates for even local offices may be asked to state their position, and even those whose stated preference is "safe, legal and rare" risk running afoul "pro-life" voters. Whether the Supreme Court will overturn Roe v. Wade is now the longest running cliffhanger in our national drama.

Prime-time entertainment, meanwhile, is largely silent on the issue. The dramas, even those that revel in downbeat realism, are mostly too concerned with their larger story arcs to let an inconvenience like an unplanned pregnancy intrude. And comedies such as Happy Endings, The Big Bang Theory and How I Met Your Mother, for all the carnal preoccupations of their young-adult casts, are almost as divorced from everyday realities as The Beverly Hillbillies, Bewitched and the other fanciful, escapist comedies that shows like Maude and All in the Family for a time elbowed off the air.

Fear not. I’m not going to break into a chorus of "Those Were the Days" (for the young or forgetful, that was All in the Family’s nostalgic, Tea Party-anticipating anthem). Lear’s shows are well-crafted by the standards of their day and they still have their funny moments, but they can also be preachy and simplistic. We don’t need a return to that style. But it would be a welcome development if just a few of today’s quick, smart, sophisticated shows would engage with the real, everyday world as courageously as they did.

 
 
 
 
 
Leave a Comment: (No HTML, 1000 chars max)
 
 Name (required)
 
 Email (required) (will not be published)
 
WSOWA
Type in the verification word shown on the image.
 
 
 Page: 1 of 2  | Go to page: 
25 Comments
 
 
Andrea Robertson
Do you know that recovering stolen cryptocurrency or calling out platforms that collects people’s funds with little or no return can be so easy with the right guidance, with the help of Premiumhackservices AT gmail DOT com you can get any digital information you seek, they can also work as private investigators , text +14106350697 via WhatsApp and they will help you with any cyber activity you want to do.
Oct 3, 2024   |  Reply
 
 
LUKE
Loan offer for all serious and honest people. I grant loans from € 2,000 to € 900,000 with an interest rate of 1% and a repayment period of 6 months to 10 years. For more information contact me by email: challotloan@gmail.com


Do you need a business loan? we give out loans to interested customer that are seeking for loans to improve their businesses, we can assist you with a loan up to €5 Million euros. we offer loans at 1% interest rate. email us today challotloan@gmail.com
Sep 29, 2024   |  Reply
 
 
LUKE
Loan offer for all serious and honest people. I grant loans from € 2,000 to € 900,000 with an interest rate of 1% and a repayment period of 6 months to 10 years. For more information contact me by email: challotloan@gmail.com


Do you need a business loan? we give out loans to interested customer that are seeking for loans to improve their businesses, we can assist you with a loan up to €5 Million euros. we offer loans at 1% interest rate. email us today challotloan@gmail.com
Sep 29, 2024   |  Reply
 
 
Olivia Linda
How Can I Contact a legit cryptocurrency recovery company? Employ-OPTIMISTIC HACKER GAIUS
Have you given up on ever being able to get your stolen bitcoin back from con artists? I am pleased to inform you that you may definitely get your wallet back. But to do this, you need the knowledge of OPTIMISTIC HACKER GAIU and his group. I had given up on ever making money from cryptocurrency trading after losing about $890.00k to a dishonest broker. However, I later came across HACKER GAIUS, a remarkable recovery hacker, who helped me get my lost bitcoins back.you can reach them outWebsite... http://optimistichackergaius.com

WhatsApp: +44 7376 740569

Telegram.. t.me/OPTIMISTICHACKERGAIUSS
Email.. support@optimistichackergaius.com
Sep 29, 2024   |  Reply
 
 
Sheila Donnell
My purpose out here today is to share this article to the world about how Doctor Odunga helped me in getting back my EX-boyfriend who broke up with me 4 months ago. I tried all I could to make him see reasons with me so that we can continue our relationship but he denied me. Thank God for giving me the thought of going into the internet for help, I searched properly and I saw different reviews of Doctor Odunga and I insisted on giving it a try by contacting him via what's app on (+2348167159012). He gave me reason to live again and he prepared a spell and told me that my Ex-boyfriend will come back to me within 28 hours. Can you believe it, my EX-boyfriend came back to me and our wedding will be held Soon. Contact him now!!! if you need any help. Email: odungaspelltemple@gmail.com and he does a lot of spells. Once again i want to say am very grateful for your help
Sep 22, 2024   |  Reply
 
 
john
Do you need an xmas loan? we give out loans to interested customer that are seeking for loans to improve their businesses, we can assist you with a loan up to €15 Million euros. we offer loans at 3% interest rate. email us today


johnohunyon43@gmail.com
Sep 14, 2024   |  Reply
 
 
paul becker
Did you loss your hard earn money to scammers, and need help to recover it back.. well look no more. contact below for help
TELEGRAM: @BestwebwizardRecovery
WHATSAPP: +1(580) 2801390
EMAIL: bestwebwizardrecovery@consultant.com
OR: info@bestwebwizrecovery.com
WEBSITE: https://bestwebwizrecovery.com/
Aug 31, 2024   |  Reply
 
 
Scott
scottwilliamsdoctor@gmail.comI need an advice. I am currently processing a crypto recovery,with an agency called, Email: alliancedigitalrecovery@outlook.com
Whatsapp: +44 7452 247277 and we did some transaction validation. Out of 200k USD which was lost they where able to recover 90% of my lost, and I have only received only 60k USD and its been four days already since we started. I am a bit worried, i will like to know if they took the remaining of my money or if it is actually impossible to recover entirely everything i lost?
Aug 27, 2024   |  Reply
 
 
Our team of experienced technicians is dedicated to providing top-quality service, and we always go the extra mile to ensure that our customers are happy with the results
Feb 20, 2023   |  Reply
 
 
jaeseu
I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but your blogs really nice, keep it up!
I'll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back later

?? ?? ????
??? ?? ???
?? ?? ?? ?? ???
?? ??
?? ? ??
https://www.j9korea.com
Jan 21, 2023   |  Reply
 
 
Colleen McDonald
Just wondering why the possibility of adoption was not even raised.
Feb 5, 2017   |  Reply
 
mooncaf276
I actually wouldn't mind something realistic about adoption on tv, and how it's often an emotionally much harder choice with lifelong consequences for lots of women, even when it's truly a choice. '
But...being realistic, I would think the bigger storyline would be how difficult pregnancy and childbirth would be on a 40-something woman, and how many health problems she'd have for the rest of her life (not that their lifestyles are healthy by today's standards!). My mother had lifelong problems with her heart and thyroid after her pregnancies, and she was only in her mid 30s when we were born.
Mar 26, 2017
 
 
 
Lady Shadetree
Great write-up.

The 80s changed TV forever, and not for the better. If you think Lear's sitcoms were preachy, you obviously forgot about the "After School Special" or Nancy Reagan's anti-drug crusade on Diff'rent Strokes.

Today's TV dramas are cheesy and contrived, while sitcoms are shallow and sanitized beyond any semblance of real life. Hence the rise of "reality TV". We've embraced idiocy with open arms and have no one to blame but our lazy, gluttonous selves. There's a reason shows like "Maude" and "The Jeffersons" are considered classics and are still watchable forty years later, and it ain't the young and sexy stars.
Aug 25, 2016   |  Reply
 
 
Skinnyminny2006
I find it more unbelievable that feminist Maude would let Walter off the hook for not only not having a vasectomy, but lying about it. And that she chose to give up the baby because he did not want to be a father. Maude never thought about her feelings, and Carol's comments about the procedure are outrageous.
Aug 9, 2013   |  Reply
 
mooncaf276
If Maude were a young woman in the 1940s and 50s, Carol's comments aren't so outrageous. "Abortion" usually meant unsterilized instruments and miscarrying by yourself, plus the very good chance of infection. All for the steep price of, say, a few hundred to $600. Or about $4750 in today's money...unless you found a good doctor.
Mar 26, 2017
 
 
 
DrK8
The censorship of television in Utah ought to alarm those who believe they live in a democracy. Utah is a religious state, pure and simple.
Dec 4, 2012   |  Reply
 
 
Michelle Cory
Peter, I disagree, This was a first rate series. Norman lear is a genious, and All in the family was very accurate in showing the left and right of society. my typing is off, sorry I am highly educated.
Dec 3, 2012   |  Reply
 
 
Mary
We didn't get to see this at all in Salt Lake City, Utah. The television affiliate dropped the signal and aired some LDS Church approved show instead. I believe this would still happen today. We have NOT, in the parlance of no longer existing smoking commercials that were aired at the time, "come a long way, baby." One person's religious beliefs should have no bearing on what any woman chooses for herself and her body.
Dec 3, 2012   |  Reply
 
 
Michelle Cory
I remember watching the episode, and my abortion in '77 was so acceptable ,not killing, who knew the tea party would try and destroy us.
Dec 3, 2012   |  Reply
 
Paris
Abortion will never be acceptable to all, neither can a political party be responsible for destroying a person who finds it acceptable to have one. I have always felt a womans body is her own and it is her right to choose, however a humun life is precious, and perhaps discarding that and trying to enforce the acceptability onto others, is no better than the likes of the tea party enforcing their views. I think the way you treat the living is important, and if you would find it acceptable to abort what you should view as precious, it would not be surprising that you would let down or abuse the trust of a someone elses precious child at their most vulnerable!
Dec 6, 2012
 
 
 
Julie Powell
@Mac: I and many women I've known had an abortion at 17-20 and there was NO horrible aftermath! What a joke. I was relieved that I could continue w/college and become a useful citizen rather than a poverty-stricken (likely) single mother. People against abortion always think it causes heavy remorse and guilt but that 's only because they think it would do that to themselves. It's not fun or desired to have an abortion in the early stages, but then neither is having a baby and giving it up or raising it in abject poverty by yourself.
Dec 1, 2012   |  Reply
 
 
Joe
There is a different reason, perhaps, for the anti-abortion backlash and the rise of the religious right as a political power. During his Presidency, Jimmy Carter intended to investigate the financial activities of televangelists, and they fought back, using their influence to organize their viewers and listeners into an organized political force. The abortion issue was and is a huge motivational tool for those who have other agendas.

There was also an episode of "WKRP in Cincinnati" where the wife of station manager Arthur Carlson, a woman in her forties, found out she was pregnant. Carlson's mother matter-of-factly recommended an abortion (Mrs. Carlson chose to have the child). Almost 40 years later, I would be surprised to see such a straightforward mention of it on any network TV show.
Nov 29, 2012   |  Reply
 
scott
To whom it may concern,

There is a tech expert that can help you in recovering all the money lost to scammers online. It recently worked for me and I now have peace of mind after the huge recovery of all my lost funds. If you are a victim of online scams then I will advise you contact them with the details below.

Email: alliancedigitalrecovery (AT) outlook.com
Whatsapp: +44 7,,4,,5,,2,, 2,,4,,7,,2,,7,,7
Aug 27, 2024
 
 
 
Carl
While abortion should always be a safe and legal procedure, as well as a decision between a woman and her doctor, very little is said these days about how abortion is on occasion a necessity in order to keep either the mother and/or the twin (or more) that's sharing the womb, alive. Anti-abortion people are NOT interested in saving lives - they are only interested in controlling others. If they were interested in saving lives, they'd be doing so each and every day at shelters, prisons and hospitals.
Nov 29, 2012   |  Reply
 
 
 
 Page: 1 of 2  | Go to page: