DAVID BIANCULLI

Founder / Editor

ERIC GOULD

Associate Editor

LINDA DONOVAN

Assistant Editor

Contributors

ALEX STRACHAN

MIKE HUGHES

KIM AKASS

MONIQUE NAZARETH

ROGER CATLIN

GARY EDGERTON

TOM BRINKMOELLER

GERALD JORDAN

NOEL HOLSTON

 
 
 
 
 
C'mon, 'GH' Writers - Are You Trying to Kill Soaps, Too?
April 28, 2011  | By Ed Martin
 
gh-liz-lucky-jake-christmas.jpg

By Ed Martin

Anyone who is still wondering why broadcast soap operas are disappearing before our eyes need only review recent episodes of ABC's General Hospital.

Don't blame shrinking audiences. (Viewers aren't really going away in these high-tech times. They're just harder to count.)

Don't blame competition from other media. (Overall media consumption is on the rise, boosted by evolving digital technologies that make following a favorite soap easier than ever.)

Don't blame the recent round of network budget cuts. (Low-budget serialized storytelling is thriving on basic cable television, and there is no reason why broadcast soaps can't adapt.)

Whatever you do, don't blame the actors. (There are dozens of fine performers of all ages on the six remaining soaps.)

So what's the problem? Take a good long look at the current Death of Little Jake Webber storyline on GH, and you'll have your answer.

It's the writing, plain and simple.

I've never been a fan of soap stories that involve the deaths of children, and that includes the now legendary Death of BJ saga on GH almost 20 years ago -- another tale in which one kid died a sudden death and made available a critical organ to save an afflicted child elsewhere on the canvas.

At the time, I thought the loss of Nurse Bobbie Spencer Jones' little girl would in the long term damage the show, in that I could imagine dozens of stories about BJ in her troubled teen and young adult years and the impact her behavior would have on her mother, who had been a rather combustible teen herself. For the most part, I was wrong about that. The show found plenty of stories to tell even without BJ, and the transplant story was so magnificently written and acted that it brought a new level of respect to daytime drama.

gh-bobbie-tony-heart.jpg

The only downside was that it forever damaged two previously vital characters: Nurse Bobbie and her husband, Dr. Tony Jones. Bobbie fared better than Tony, who suffered an emotional breakdown, lost his family, his job and the respect of his community, was physically brutalized by mob assassin Jason Morgan and gunned down by Carly Benson (the baby that Bobbie gave birth to during her time as a teenage prostitute and then forgot about for 20 years). Tony slowly put the pieces of his life back together, only to die from a sweeps-induced virus.

The GH writing team, which for much of the last 10 years has specialized in telling repetitive stories about local mobsters that have collectively played like a low-rent version of The Sopranos, has also during that time gone to great lengths to viciously subvert storylines and destroy characters from the show's most creatively successful periods of the past. I haven't been fond of those stories, but that has often been a matter of personal taste. My issues were with the stories themselves, not the way in which they were being told.

The current Death of Jake Webber disappointment is another matter entirely, and it comes at a time when soaps overall are in dire peril -- and in desperate need of well-thought-out stories that respect their shows' histories while reinventing them for the future.

In that regard, this latest GH tale has done everything wrong: It has made viewers feel bad about the time they have invested in the Jake storyline during the last few years, and killed off a character that was uniquely positioned to be at the center of dozens of compelling stories in the years to come. That's no way to improve a show or support a dying genre.

If the writers and producers of GH truly felt it necessary at this time to tell a story so reminiscent of the Death of BJ, then they should have killed off baby Josslyn, the daughter of Carly and her current husband, Jax, and the recipient of one of poor little Jake's kidneys.

gh-maxie-heart.jpg

(One of many telling aspects of the subpar storytelling here is that Josslyn wasn't even sick two weeks ago and wasn't diagnosed with a rare form of kidney cancer until the night poor Jake was run down by a car. In the BJ story, we had watched her little cousin Maxie suffer from a weakening heart over a period of time, a compelling tale in itself even before her cousin BJ was abruptly killed in a bus crash and Maxie received her heart.)

Why should they have killed Josslyn? To begin with, it has been reported that the actor who portrays Jax will be seen less on the show, which makes his one child comparatively unimportant in the long-term. Second, if Josslyn had died and Jake had needed a transplant, it would have been a fine opportunity for the writers to finally humanize Carly, a frequently detestable character with the emotional stability of an 8-year-old. She has done all sorts of nasty things during the last 15 years, but she has never been more disturbing than in recent weeks, when she chose to focus on sabotaging her ex-husband's wedding rather than deal with the fact that her oldest son had been raped in prison -- an incarceration that she had as much to do with as anyone else. (It was her decision to remove the boy from his birth father's family, the much put-upon Quartermaines, and insist that he be raised with her new husband, a dangerous mobster.)

gh-carly-josslyn.jpg

It would have made for powerful drama indeed, to watch Carly and Jax say goodbye to their little girl, and then to see Carly decide to give one of Josslyn's organs to Jake, the son of her best friend, Jason Morgan, and one of the countless women with whom she does not get along, nurse Elizabeth Webber. I believe that would have been the first time in the history of the character that Carly would have acted in an entirely unselfish manner.

Why shouldn't they have killed Jake? He's actually a member of four core families on the canvas -- the Hardys (his maternal great-grandfather is Dr. Steve Hardy, the main character when GH began), the Webbers (his maternal grandfather is Dr. Jeff Webber, the illegitimate son of Dr. Steve), the Quartermaines (his biological father, Jason, is the son of the late great Dr. Alan Quartermaine and the stepson of Dr. Monica Quartermaine), and the Spencers (his adoptive father is Lucky Spencer, son of the legendary Luke and Laura). Jake's true identity as Jason's son has been a secret in order to keep Jake safe from Jason's mobster enemies. It isn't too much of a stretch to assert that Jake could have been the very foundation of the show's future.)

gh-jonathan-jackson-lucky-spencer.jpg

The only good thing I can think of to say about this story is that it has been a showcase for several actors on the show, especially the incomparable Jonathan Jackson, who plays Lucky. I haven't seen a performance of such emotional intensity on a daytime drama since Judith Light's still unsurpassed work as a tortured former prostitute forced to tell all in court on One Life to Live. To hell with the Daytime Emmys -- this guy deserves an Oscar!

gh-jason-morgan-luke-spencer.jpg

Similarly, Steve Burton, the actor who plays Jason, hasn't been this good since the story of Monica's breast cancer, and Rebecca Herbst, arguably the most popular female actor in the GH cast, has never been better as Elizabeth. (ABC recently reduced Herbst to recurring status, apparently unaware of her vast legion of fans. Their collective outrage moved the network to briskly restore her full-time.)

There is so much else to complain about here that the mind boggles. I should note that Jake has never been anything but a plot point. Viewers didn't get the chance to get to know the poor little guy, so the sense of loss here has been lessened. (BJ, on the other hand, was a significant part of GH for many years. The same is true of her cousin Maxie, who remains on the canvas to this day.)

gh-luke-laura-lucky-90s.jpg

Further, it is inconceivable that a number of legacy characters with strong ties to this story haven't even been seen in the background. Elizabeth's grandmother, Audrey, who has taken care of Jake since he was born, has mysteriously disappeared. (Rachel Ames, the actress who played Audrey for more than 40 years, has retired; but if she wasn't able to return for a day or two, then couldn't the character have been recast?) Jason's stepmother, Monica, who never even knew Jake was her grandson, has also been absent, as has Carly's mother, Bobbie, even though they both work in the hospital. Lucky's mother, Laura, is currently receiving medical treatment in France, but we could have seen Luke or Lucky talking with her on the phone. Laura's mother and Lucky's grandmother, Leslie, hasn't been around, either.

Brief appearances by characters that viewers have known for decades always enhance stories of families in crisis. Not to have seen any of these people at a time of such searing tragedy is not simply annoying. It's unrealistic and irresponsible.

It is also unfortunate that the GH writers chose to muck up the emotionally dismantling drama of it all, with an absurd subplot that found six characters driving at night on the dark road where Elizabeth lives, at the very time that Jake toddled out the front door and into the path of an oncoming car. We have been led to believe that Lucky's boozy father, Luke, hit the boy -- but I'm guessing the real culprit is the driver of a mysterious black town car (license plate obscured on traffic camera footage) that was also speeding along that same road at the same time.

gh-lucky-luke-spencer-jake.jpg

Shouldn't the death of one child and the near-death of another have been enough drama for this storyline? If it had to be told in the first place, why build in so silly a distraction? Further, if Luke really is to blame, is that an experience we really want to attach to a character that has been crucially important to an entire programming genre for more than 30 years? As creative decisions go, this one is perfectly wretched.

The ruination of Luke Spencer is just the latest assault on the GH audience. The writers of this show have during the last decade-plus destroyed fond memories of Dr. Rick Webber and Scott Baldwin by reworking their long-ago histories (in the process revealing a complete lack of respect for soap opera viewers); destroyed the marriage of Luke and Laura, and then sent Laura spiraling into madness (another character development nobody wanted to see); botched the brief return of long-ago loony-tune Heather Webber; and killed off good-girl Georgie Jones (who was conceived during the Death of BJ storyline and was the perfect foil for her wild sister Maxie).

gh-quartermaine-family.jpg

Most distressingly, they killed off most of the hugely popular Quartermaine family, including the all-important Alan (who should have been allowed to retire with Monica), bad-seed AJ (like Jake a character that could have driven plot for years), adopted daughter Emily (a much-loved character who touchingly came onto the canvas when Monica was battling breast cancer), lawyer Justus (Edward Quartermaine's illegitimate grandson and one of the show's few black characters), and now poor Jake.

I'll never understand the wisdom of continually killing or otherwise destroying characters that matter to millions of viewers, especially at a time when a show is struggling to hold onto its audience.

The overriding issue for those involved in daytime drama is this: As in any other business, if you don't give people what they want, they are going to go away.

If you give them what they don't want, they will leave even faster.

 

2 Comments

 

SharonGS said:

Thank you so much for writing this. I have followed "General Hospital" since its beginnings, watching during vacations and reading recaps in newspapers in the days before video recordings and the Internet, and seeing its characters deliberately destroyed by its current producers and writers is heartbreaking. I hope that the people in charge of ABC read your piece and begin to realize that, for many of us, without compelling storytelling on soaps, we won't watch daytime TV at all. There are too many other media options out there--even great soaps from other countries.

Comment posted on March 29, 2011 11:30 AM


Catherina said:

It is really sad how soaps are coming now. But here's the thing for GH. It was Robert Guza who ruined most of everything. He refused to bring back Genie Francis, Rick Hearst, or Billy Warlock, made Sonny and Carly into raving lunatics, turned promising young executive Michael into a young mobster and having him sleep with girls who are TEN years old than him. And As The World Turns was canceled?! The writing there was so much better.

I have heard rumors that Genie Francis wanted to come back for the Jake's death storyline, Rick Hearst, who is being released from B&B, is looking for a return to GH (I mean, come on! With Sonny's crazy coming out, what a better time for Ric to return and give him a kick in the butt!) and Billy Warlock is also anxious to return to stir up some more trouble. I guess that the only good thing that Guza did was creating the character of Ethan and beginning a relationship between him and Kristina.

I guess all we can do now is hope that Garin Wolf will fix Guza's mistakes and reboot the series before we lose our beloved GH too.

Comment posted on September 14, 2011 12:43 PM
 
 
 
 
 
Leave a Comment: (No HTML, 1000 chars max)
 
 Name (required)
 
 Email (required) (will not be published)
 
KITPV
Type in the verification word shown on the image.