DAVID BIANCULLI

Founder / Editor

ERIC GOULD

Associate Editor

LINDA DONOVAN

Assistant Editor

Contributors

ALEX STRACHAN

MIKE HUGHES

KIM AKASS

MONIQUE NAZARETH

ROGER CATLIN

GARY EDGERTON

TOM BRINKMOELLER

GERALD JORDAN

NOEL HOLSTON

 
 
 
 
 
Examining TARP with 'A Vice Special Report: Panic: The Untold Story of the 2008 Financial Crisis'
December 10, 2018  | By David Hinckley  | 4 comments
 
 
Anyone who laments the lack of bipartisanship in contemporary America can sigh with wistful nostalgia over a new Vice documentary (in collaboration with HBO) on the trillion-dollar 2008 government bailout fondly known as TARP.
 
As director John Maggio points out in A Vice Special Report: Panic: The Untold Story of the 2008 Financial Crisis, airing Monday at 10 p.m. ET on HBO, no one on either side of the political aisle liked the idea of the government bailing out large failed or failing financial and corporate institutions.
 
The left saw it as giveaways to Wall Street and the rich at a time when their failures had crippled millions of ordinary citizens.
 
The right saw it as a betrayal of capitalism and the free market.
 
Both sides saw it as rewarding the behavior, and as it all unfolded in the middle of a presidential election between Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain, it must have seemed like a natural for both candidates to run against it.
 
They didn’t because the only consensus stronger than the opposition to the bailout was the reluctant agreement that if it weren’t enacted, many of those large banks and financial institutions might go under. If that happened, millions more ordinary people would find their money and their jobs gone, and the country would face the real possibility of another Great Depression.
 
So the plan, hatched in its first form under President George W. Bush, was fully implemented by Obama after he won the November 2008 election.
 
Panic takes extensive note of the opposition to the bailout. It argues persuasively that anger over the bailout fueled the formation of the Tea Party and much of the populist fervor that picked up the same angry banner.
 
It tacitly nods approval to those who say the bailout set in motion the forces that propelled Donald Trump into the White House.
 
And, in the end, it suggests the bailout was essential to preserve the economic health of the United States, and, by extension, much of the world.
 
It makes that case largely through the three men who formulated the original plan – Treasury Secretary Hank Paulsen, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, and New York Federal Reserve chief Timothy Geithner. They recount, step-by-step, how they came up with the plan and why, then the long, arduous uphill battle of forcing a reluctant Congress and country swallow it.
 
All three stress they thought it was a bad move. It was just better than any other move and much better than no move at all. The collapse of banks and mortgage institutions, for instance, could have thrown millions of people out of their homes – on top of the hundreds of thousands to whom that had already happened.
 
Propping up the institutions, they argue, was the only way to keep those commitments intact and maintain confidence in an economy that was teetering on the brink of implosion.
 
George W. Bush, who like Obama and others is interviewed here, says he hated the idea and still does. But, he says, he too was persuaded there was no way around it. So he helped twist Republican arms, and ultimately enough joined with a majority of Democrats to push the TARP bailout through.
 
Geithner acknowledges, like his colleagues, that the bailout never won public approval. Ironically, he and Paulsen both note, it turned out to be a financial win for taxpayers, who ultimately made billions more than they spent as the bailed-out institutions recovered.
 
Panic provides a fascinating if at times familiar retrospective on the political process here. It examines how legislators of very different ideological persuasions were convinced to support something they didn’t believe in that could also have hurt them politically.
 
As for the three initial architects of the plan, they stand by their actions today even as they acknowledge not everyone sees those actions as profiles in courage.
 
 
 
 
 
Leave a Comment: (No HTML, 1000 chars max)
 
 Name (required)
 
 Email (required) (will not be published)
 
VRAFM
Type in the verification word shown on the image.
 
 
 Page: 1 of 1  | Go to page: 
4 Comments
 
 
We carbide inserts are made of tungsten carbide. A kind of alloy material used to machine resulting in optimum strength and rigidity., welcome to our website to learn more about carbide inserts:https://www.estoolcarbide.com
Mar 7, 2024   |  Reply
 
 
Estool cermet inserts can be used for turning, milling, threading, and grooving. It is suitable to use for the vapor deposition method to deposit a thin layer of harder materials on the surface of the blade to improve cutting performance., welcome to our website to learn more about carbide inserts:https://www.estoolcarbide.com
Mar 1, 2024   |  Reply
 
 
Our carbide inserts allow fast machining, dimensional stability, and better surface finish on metal parts. Estool inserts also have low-temperature resistance, good thermal and electrical conductivity, and many other excellent properties. Estool is the name you can trust for world-class carbide inserts., welcome to our website to learn more about carbide inserts:https://www.estoolcarbide.com
Jan 29, 2024   |  Reply
 
 
Mary McCaw
A white wash of CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. Why was this movie made at this time? If this is a push for Hilary's next run for President - forget it. If this is to try to justify their actions - rubbish. It is like those who march to the gallows claiming that they did indeed do good. Elitism to the end. I am not buying it.
Dec 16, 2018   |  Reply
 
Jim
Agree 100%
Apr 5, 2020
 
 
Mike
I find your lack of intelligence, disturbing.
Dec 17, 2018
 
 
 
 
 Page: 1 of 1  | Go to page: