DAVID BIANCULLI

Founder / Editor

ERIC GOULD

Associate Editor

LINDA DONOVAN

Assistant Editor

Contributors

ALEX STRACHAN

MIKE HUGHES

KIM AKASS

MONIQUE NAZARETH

ROGER CATLIN

GARY EDGERTON

TOM BRINKMOELLER

GERALD JORDAN

NOEL HOLSTON

 
 
 
 
 
'CBS This Morning' Takes First Steps, Doesn't Stumble... And Heads in the Right Direction
January 9, 2012  | By David Bianculli
 
morning-show-1st-top.jpg

[UPDATE: Today (Tuesday) on NPR's Fresh Air with Terry Gross, I review CBS's new morning program -- including clips from today's show. Points for timeliness! - And for including clips of a fun moment or two from NBC's Rock Center with Brian Williams. - DB]

By watching its premiere telecast, you can tell much more about a news program's immediate weaknesses than its potential strengths. Chemistry and reputation take time to build, but groan-inducing mistakes, missteps and poor editorial judgments are there from the start.

In Monday's inaugural two-hour broadcast of CBS This Morning, that network's latest reboot of a morning-show franchise, co-hosts Charlie Rose, Gayle King and Erica Hill took what Rose, in his closing, referred to as the first steps in a journey of a million miles.

That may be an overly optimistic itinerary -- but in this first outing from a show built around the idea that serious news is good news, CBS This Morning indeed got out of the gate without a stumble...

Its claim to being the "serious" morning-news alternative is a bit shaky at times. Day 1 of this new CBS experiment (7 a.m. ET; check local listings) included segments on Royals correspondent Victoria Arbiter talking about Princess Kate's 30th birthday, for example, and guest Melissa Etheridge talking about the music and appeal of Adele.

morning-show-60-mins-ambush.jpg

But the show also led with Rose's interview, via satellite, with Newt Gingrich, one day before the New Hampshire primary, and Rose and Hill debriefing CBS Evening News anchor Scott Pelley on his 60 Minutes story, from the night before, which included an ambush interview of an apparently shady doctor involved in what clearly lied like a stem-cell scam.

Ambush interviews, of course, are nothing new. Neither is 60 Minutes, which launched in 1968, and remains the oldest currentlly running show in prime time. Mike Wallace specialized in ambush interviews decades ago, and Pelley upholds the tradition nicely.

When he comes onto CBS This Morning to advance and deconstruct the piece, fielding questions from colleagues on a sister show on his own network, he's doing the same thing White House correspondents Bill Plante and Norah O'Donnell are doing when they're talking about the latest book on Barack and Michelle Obama. They're focusing on the news, sure -- but they're also drawing focus to themselves, in a canny bit of cross-promotion.

But there's nothing at all wrong with that.

It's done all the time, on another recent addition to the "serious" news program genre, NBC's Rock Center with Brian Williams -- and usually in a very satisfying fashion. You can learn as much, and often do, by listening to Ted Koppel talk with Williams, after his report on Iraq and Afghanistan, as you can from the piece itself.

morning-show-margulies.jpg

Even though Rose had a timely news "get" with Gingrich, not much emerged from it -- and the best piece of the day Monday was from Pelley, whose full-length 60 Minutes piece the night before was even better. An interview with Julianna Margulies, with the entire troika of CBS This Morning anchors seated around the same table, generated little. But there was no cooking, no genial joshing, no 12 tips to (fill in the blank).

All those absences, in the overall scheme of things, are definite pluses.

CBS, to its credit, already has four substantial, "serious" news programs on its schedule. There's 60 Minutes, still the best newsmagazine since See It Now. There's the CBS Evening News, now more somber, and more watchable and consistent, in its post-Katie Couric era. There's Face the Nation, which Bob Schieffer has turned into a fine Sunday addition of late, particularly with his smart closing essays.

And finally, there's the beloved, perfectly pitched Sunday Morning, now hosted by Charles Osgood, which is like a Sunday newspaper -- more patient, filling and varied than its daily counterpart.

In a dozen years, that newspaper simile may not even work, because few will know what a newspaper is, or was. But the concept of being more serious is a smart one - literally. It doesn't say every report will be somber and full of gravitas -- just that the programs won't pander, and will exercise taste as well as restraint and judgment.

But it doesn't mean you can't have fun. Last week's Jan. 2 edition of Rock Center with Brian Williams featured a hastily assembled feature on the street-cleaners who clear all the trash from Times Square after the ball falls on New Year's Eve. (Hastily assembled, in this context, is a necessity, not a criticism.)

The piece won me over right after the ball dropped, and the next image shown was a team of street cleaners marching towards the camera, ready to start. The music on the soundtrack was the superbly chosen Wilson Pickett version of "In the Midnight Hour" ("I'm gonna wait till the midnight hour / when there's no one else around...").

rock-center-wake-up-in-a-ci.jpg

I would have thought that was untoppable -- but two of the guys with brooms topped it, by doing an a cappella, slightly revised version of "New York, New York" while merrily, and musically, going about their duties:

"I want to wake up," they sang, "in the city that never sweeps..."

Rock Center is on the right track. And so, it seems, is CBS This Morning, which seemed to believe you could, indeed, be light without being lightweight.

morning-show-dick-van-dyke-.jpg

The inaugural day at CBS This Morning even included a nod to Dick Van Dyke, who had been the host of CBS's The Morning Show (as it was called then) way, way back in 1955. Reading the news for Van Dyke back then? Walter Cronkite, still several years away from anchoring The CBS Evening News.

With that report, CBS proved it had a very long tradition in that time slot -- just not a successful one.

NBC's Today, on the other hand, celebrates its 60th anniversary later this week, on Jan. 14.

That's a number, and a program, that's guaranteed to get googols (or at least Googles) of built-in attention this week, so CBS This Morning won't be in the spotlight for long. But that's okay.

Charlie Rose is right. With luck, there's a long journey ahead. Focusing on one week, like focusing on one show, would be making a mistake.

It's pretty clear, though, that as journeys go, CBS This Morning has chosen the right path...

 

3 Comments

 

Neil said:

I'd normally let a typo slip by (unless I was just in the mood to harass you), but since you did this twice, I assume it was an intentional, though incorrect, word choice.

Twice you used "somber" to describe the first episode of CBS This Morning. My little on-screen dictionary defines somber as:

- dark or dull in color or tone;
gloomy : the night skies were
somber and starless.
- oppressively solemn or sober in
mood; grave : he looked at her
with a somber expression.

I think you meant "sober", which would have conveyed your intent less darkly or oppressively.

As the CBS programs you mentioned - and Brian Williams' Rock Center - have recently demonstrated, it isn't a necessity to dumb down the presentation to attract an audience. "Entertaining" does not have to be synonymous with lightweight, trivial or stupid. I really wish the rest of NBC News, as well as ABC, CNN and Fox, would learn this lesson too.

Though if they did, Jon Stewart would have sooo much less material to work with.

[I accept the distinction, and the correction, completely. Maybe if I'd been somber when I wrote it... - DB]

Comment posted on January 9, 2012 6:11 PM


Erin said:

I was pretty impressed with This Morning. I thought the most problematic segment was the one with Marguiles. It appeared as though she was being thrown questions from all angles, both literally and metaphorically. Charlie asked a question about the Good Wife, and then Gayle asked a question about living in New York, and then Erica asked a question about her charity work. There was no cohesiveness in the questioning. No wonder Marguiles looked a bit shell shocked. I think in that situation fewer interviewers would have lead to a more satisfying few minutes. I'll be tuning in for more.

[This is SUCH a smart observation! And such a smart way of describing it, too: "from all angles, both literally and metaphorically." I swear, the readers on our site write better, and think better, than the writers on most other sites. Thanks! - DB]

Comment posted on January 10, 2012 2:00 PM


Susan said:

I, too, am more than ready for a serious morning news show, and stopped watching GMA on ABC when I could no longer stomach what I call the stupid segments, which you covered in your review. The new CBS offering comes close but I find it overly slick, over-produced, and looking too much like all the rest. There was something almost homey and unpretentious about The Early Show that I really enjoyed-probably the hosts. Thank goodness Erica Hill is on the new show to keep that down-to-earth vibe going. I loved the interview with the incredible Julianna Margulies and appreciated Charlie Rose's intelligent and important questions to this guest. However, Gayle King brings an unwanted note to the cast; I found her questions inane, formulaic, and full of fluff. Asking about the business suits worn by Ms. Margulies' character? Really? Oh, please. Leave that to the other a.m. shows, or The View (if it's still on) or other women-oriented shows. It's just too silly for my taste. I have no problem with interspersing lighter or humorous pieces such as the New York one, which I found highly enjoyable. But the hosts need to maintain their intellectual muscle in keeping an overall atmosphere of intelligence if they want to set this program apart and make it a must-watch, for those of us who have been fed up with the rest of the frivolous fare offered on the other networks.

[Agreed -- and yes, The View is still on. That's why so many other shows continue to try and emulate it. - DB]

Comment posted on January 10, 2012 8:59 PM
 
 
 
 
 
Leave a Comment: (No HTML, 1000 chars max)
 
 Name (required)
 
 Email (required) (will not be published)
 
PLSXG
Type in the verification word shown on the image.