PART 2: The History channel didn’t send a copy of this new program, which began yesterday, for preview. (You can catch up on Part 1 at 7 p.m. ET.) Nevertheless, I’m hoping it’s more conjectural and hypothetical than a fact-based documentary. Otherwise, I’ve bought January plane tickets for nothing. And I’ve just had a revelation of my own: If this special is, we hope, theorizing about the future, isn’t the History Channel the last place it should be televised?

Leave a Comment: (No HTML, 1000 chars max)

Name (required)

Email (required) (will not be published)


Type in the verification word shown on the image.

Page: 1 of 1 | Go to page:

7 Comments

RKeys

I quit watching after about an hour. The first person hand held camera perspective they used for most of show made me nauseous. I went back to the NFL playoff games.

Jan 3, 2015 | Reply

tochay

I'm so expert and I never posts comments but the filming was AWFUL the camera just moved around so much I couldn't stand to watch more than 10 min of this.....no more episodes for me!

Jan 1, 2015 | Reply

Jan orourke

Don't bother.Looked forward to seeing this program however extremely disappointed in the filming. I have no qualms about the content of the program but the execution of the program was terrible. The hand held camera work was awful.The majority of the program was filming the ground or the backs of people.It was almost impossible to get a comprehensive overview of what was going on.The audio was just as bad.The music overshadowed any meaningful dialogue, which was minimal. Well got that off my chest.Onward to the next special

Dec 31, 2014 | Reply

Jan orourke

Looked forward to seeing this program however extremely disappointed in the filming. I have no qualms about the content of the program but the execution of the program was terrible. The hand held camera work was awful.The majority of the program was filming the ground or the backs of people.It was almost impossible to get a comprehensive overview of what was going on.The audio was just as bad.The music overshadowed any meaningful dialogue, which was minimal. Well got that off my chest.Onward to the next special

Dec 31, 2014 | Reply

Jan orourke

Dec 31, 2014 | Reply

That Guy

Says the person that can't reply without triple posting.

Jan 18, 2015

David Stein

I want to watch this show.

Dec 30, 2014 | Reply

Deanna M. Sutton

This is as the Bible stated...in the book of Daniel, the great prophet. I actually learned about the end days at bible study groups led by Ministers. As Catholic, I never heard a word of this. I feel it was hidden from us due to fear.

Dec 30, 2014 | Reply

Page: 1 of 1 | Go to page:

New From TVWW

History, 9:00 p.m. ET

PBS' 'Frontline’ Examines Pension Promises and — Spoiler Alert — Finds the Math Doesn’t Add Up

The Decadence of ‘Versailles’ Comes to Ovation

Prescribing Mamie Gummer in 'Emily Owens, M.D.'

Looking for a Free Ride? HBO Can Deliver

'Pass the Biscuits' Part of the Hatfield-McCoy Pop-Culture Legacy

1957: Julie Andrews Stars in 'Cinderella'

Dispatches From TVWW

'Extinction: The Facts' is a Sobering Call to Action

How 'Mayans' Has Been Influenced by the Show's Creator Elgin James

For Whom the Bell Tolls: Ken Burns and Lynn Novick Take on Ernest Hemingway, the Man and the Myth

In the Final Season, Sutton Foster's Liza is Now the Genuine Version of Her 'Younger' Self

Season 2 of 'City on a Hill' Returns with Kevin Bacon, Aldis Hodge, and Boston Corruption