<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>TV Worth Watching</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.tvworthwatching.com,2007-10-31:/blog//1</id>
    <updated>2010-09-01T22:53:50Z</updated>
    <subtitle>The online magazine of TV critic David Bianculli.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Publishing Platform 4.01</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Where to Find the New Emmy Winners on TV? Glad You Asked...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/09/where-to-find-the-new-emmy-win.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.tvworthwatching.com,2010:/blog//1.3059</id>

    <published>2010-09-01T14:00:18Z</published>
    <updated>2010-09-01T22:53:50Z</updated>

    <summary>If you watched the Emmys, or read the list of winners afterward, you may well have encountered an unfamiliar name or show and asked yourself, &quot;Where can I FIND these programs?&quot; Well, don&apos;t ask yourself. Ask ME, because here comes a handy-dandy list... </summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Bianculli</name>
        <uri>http://www.tvworthwatching.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<p>If you watched the Emmys, or read the list of winners afterward, you may well have encountered an unfamiliar name or show and asked yourself, "Where can I FIND these programs?" Well, don't ask yourself. Ask ME, because here comes a handy-dandy list... </p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="temple-grandin-danes_l.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/29/temple-grandin-danes_l.jpg" width="300" height="225" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>Starting with the Emmy-winning movies and miniseries, there are no scheduled repeat telecasts right now for HBO's <em>Temple Grandin</em> or <em>The Pacific.</em></p>

<p>But <em>Temple Grandin</em>, the most honored TV show at this year's Emmys, was released two weeks ago on video. So you can -- and, believe me, you SHOULD -- buy it -- and watch Claire Danes' amazing performance, and those of David Strathairn and Julia Ormond (all Emmy winners, along with awards for the show for direction and as outstanding TV movie) by clicking <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Temple-Grandin-Claire-Danes/dp/B0038M2AZA/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1283348672&sr=8-1&tag=tvworthwatchi-20">HERE.</a></p>

<p><em>The Pacific,</em> the winner for outstanding miniseries, will be released on DVD Nov. 2, and you can pre-order it <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Pacific-HBO-Miniseries-Isabel-Lucas/dp/B001IBIHQ4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1283350439&sr=8-1&tag=tvworthwatchi-20">HERE.</a></p>

<p>As for the same network's <em>You Don't Know Jack</em>, which won for writing and for actor Al Pacino as Dr. Jack Kevorkian, it can be seen next week on two occasions: Tuesday, Sept. 7, at 11 p.m. ET, and Sunday, Sept. 12, at 4:45 p.m. ET, both on the HBO-S network.</p>

<p>Now for the regular series. Here's where, and when, to catch this year's winners:</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="mad-men-09-N01.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/09/01/mad-men-09-N01.jpg" width="170" height="135" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p><em>Mad Men,</em> AMC (Won for Outstanding Drama, and Writing for a Drama) -- There's a repeat of the current episode on AMC this Friday, Sept. 3, at 9:15 a.m. ET. The next new episode airs in the show's regular Sunday night time slot, Sept. 5 at 10 -- one of the few series to run first-run programming on Labor Day weekend.</p>

<p><em>Modern Family</em>, ABC (Outstanding Comedy, Writing for a Comedy, Supporting Actor) -- This week's episode is pre-empted by ABC's CMA Music Festival special. But next Wednesday, Sept. 8, at 9 ET, Emmy winner Eric Stonestreet and the rest of the gang will be back, albeit in a summer rerun.</p>

<p><em>Glee</em>, Fox (Supporting Actress in a Comedy; Guest Actor, Comedy; Director, Comedy) -- Next Tuesday, Sept. 7, Fox presents another prime-time doubleheader. Supporting Actress winner Jane Lynch is is both, but pay special attention to the 9 p.m. ET repeat -- that's the one featuring Emmy-winner Neil Patrick Harris as Will's old glee-club rival.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="breaking-bad-10-My02.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/09/01/breaking-bad-10-My02.jpg" width="200" height="150" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p><em>Breaking Bad,</em> AMC (Actor, Drama; Supporting Actor, Drama) -- Watch Bryan Cranston and Aaron Paul work their respective Emmy-winning magic on a rerun, Monday, Sept. 6, at 9:30 p.m. ET. </p>

<p><em>Dexter</em>, Showtime (Guest Actor, Drama; Director, Drama) -- Sunday night at 9 ET, there's a repeat of one of the episodes featuring guest actor Emmy-winner John Lithgow, as the Trinity Killer. And to see it, tune in to Showtime, even though Lithgow mistakenly thanked HBO during his original acceptance speech.</p>

<p><em>Saturday Night Live,</em> NBC (Guest Actress, Comedy) -- Betty White isn't the guest host on this week's rerun, but Tina Fey is, and Justin Bieber is the musical guest. Saturday, Sept. 4, at 11:29 p.m. ET.</p>

<p><em>The Big Bang Theory</em>, CBS (Actor, Comedy) -- Jim Parsons explains it all for you, in next week's rerun: Monday, Sept. 7, at 9:30 p.m. ET.</p>

<p><em>Nurse Jackie,</em> Showtime (Actress, Comedy) -- Showtime doesn't have any reruns scheduled currently, but DirecTV's 101 Network does. If you subscribe to that satellite service, tune to that channel Wednesday at 10 p.m. ET, or about 100 other times during the week, to see Edie Falco in her very funny "I'm not funny" performance.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="closer-09-F02.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/09/01/closer-09-F02.jpg" width="170" height="135" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p><em>The Closer</em>, TNT (Actress, Drama) -- Kyra Sedgwick's next sassy turn as Brenda is Monday, Sept. 6, at 9 p.m. ET -- and even though it's Labor Day, it's an original episode, which has Brenda getting ready for her job interview for her possible promotion as Chief of Police. </p>

<p><em>Top Chef</em>, Bravo (Reality Series) -- This first-time winner can be seen at 10 p.m. ET Wednesdays. This week's episode has an outer-space theme and features astronaut Buzz Aldrin, while next week's episode, the start of this season's two-part finale, takes place in Singapore.</p>

<p><em>The Good Wife,</em> CBS (Supporting Actress, Drama) -- Tune in next Tuesday, Sept. 7, at 10 p.m. ET to see Archie Punjabi's attention-stealing role as a tough, resourceful private eye.</p>

<p><em>Law & Order: Special Victims Unit,</em> NBC (Guest Actress, Drama) -- Ann-Margret won for her guest performance here, which NBC has yet to reschedule. But if you want to catch the series anyway, it airs Wednesdays at 10 p.m. ET.</p>

<p><em>The Daily Show with Jon Stewart,</em> Comedy Central (Writing, Variety/Music/Comedy Special) - Weeknights at 11 p.m. ET, and at several rerun points during the day, you can catch installments of this still-brilliant series, which deserves every Emmy it gets. <strike>And this show, right now, ISN'T in reruns.</strike> Yes, it is, it turns out. But hey, funny is funny, even if, in my case, wrong is wrong...</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>After the Emmys, OUR Winners Are TVWW Reader Nathan and (Ahem) ME...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/after-the-emmys-our-winners-ar.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.tvworthwatching.com,2010:/blog//1.3057</id>

    <published>2010-08-31T13:00:03Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-31T13:16:06Z</updated>

    <summary>After tabulating our TV WORTH WATCHING predictions from both our readers and our writers, two people correctly guessed four out of the six major categories and emerged with bragging rights. One was TVWW reader Nathan. The other was (and don&apos;t you forget it, you other 14 writers on this site) yours truly...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Bianculli</name>
        <uri>http://www.tvworthwatching.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
After tabulating our TV WORTH WATCHING predictions from both our readers and our writers, two people correctly guessed four out of the six major categories and emerged with bragging rights. One was TVWW reader Nathan. The other was (and don't you forget it, you other 14 writers on this site) yours truly...</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="emmy-win-modern-family.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/31/emmy-win-modern-family.jpg" width="375" height="276" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>Among readers, Nathan got twice as many categories right as any other reader, correctly predicting Outstanding Comedy (ABC's <em>Modern Family</em>), Actor in a Drama Series (Bryan Cranston for AMC's <em>Breaking Bad</em>), Actor in a Comedy Series (Jim Parsons for CBS's <em>The Big Bang Theory</em>) and Actress in a Comedy Series (Edie Falco for Showtime's <em>Nurse Jackie</em>).</p>

<p>Good for you, Nathan! I'll be contacting you to get your address, for eventual receipt of the still-unknown TVWW tacky TV prize. Thanks for everyone who read, and wrote. It took a lot of work, I know.</p>

<p>As for our roster of writers here at TVWW, opinions were all over the place -- just as they are on every other topic. The general consensus was that AMC's <em>Mad Men</em> would win Outstanding Drama, as it did, and Falco got a lot of correct predictive votes, but otherwise, there was no clear trend emerging from our writers.</p>

<p>Not a single one of us saw TNT's <em>The Closer</em> star Kyra Sedgwick coming as the winner for Outstanding Actress in a Drama Series. (And we shouldn't have. No disrespect, but why not Connie Britton, Glenn Close or Julianna Margulies?)</p>

<p>Four of us, including myself, saw <em>Modern Family</em> coming, but only Bill Brioux and I guessed Cranston would pull off his three-peat, and only Theresa Corigliano and I had enough faith in Jim Parsons to predict his upset over Alec Baldwin of NBC's <em>30 Rock.</em></p>

<p>For the record: I correctly predicted <em>Mad Men, Modern Family</em>, Cranston and Parsons. Diane Werts got 2.5 categories correct (but only by gutlessly splitting her Comedy Actress vote), and those managing two correct predictions in the major categories -- the same as the <em>New York Times</em>, by the way -- were Mark Bianculli (good going, son), Bill Brioux, Theresa Corigliano, Ed Martin and Alan Pergament. The others either got one right or, perhaps the biggest winners of all, didn't play.</p>

<p>Had anyone else won but myself, I would be bestowing upon the winner the right to gloat for an entire year, and lord it over his or her fellow TVWW contributors. But as the founder and editor of this website, I must demand of myself a higher, more mature standard.</p>

<p>Nyah, nyah!</p>

<p>Thanks for trying, losers!</p>

<p>How does my dust taste??? </p>

<p>Who's the boss? Who's the boss? Who's the boss?...</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Biggest Winner at the Emmys? HBO&apos;s &quot;Temple Grandin&quot; -- And Deservedly So</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/the-biggest-winner-at-the-emmy.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.tvworthwatching.com,2010:/blog//1.3050</id>

    <published>2010-08-30T03:01:58Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-30T17:37:19Z</updated>

    <summary>The wealth was spread among many deserving Emmy winners in Monday&apos;s prime-time NBC telecast. &quot;Modern Family,&quot; &quot;Glee,&quot; &quot;Mad Men,&quot; &quot;Breaking Bad,&quot; &quot;Dexter&quot; all got more than one award. But by far the biggest winner, with five awards in all, was HBO&apos;s &quot;Temple Grandin.&quot; And deservedly so: When it premiered, I praised it as the best telemovie in years...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Bianculli</name>
        <uri>http://www.tvworthwatching.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<p>The wealth was spread among many deserving Emmy winners in Monday's prime-time NBC telecast. <em>Modern Family, Glee, Mad Men, Breaking Bad, Dexter</em> got more than one award. But by far the biggest winner, with five awards in all, was HBO's <em>Temple Grandin.</em> And deservedly so: When it premiered, I praised it as the best telemovie in years...</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="temple-grandin-danes_l.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/29/temple-grandin-danes_l.jpg" width="400" height="300" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>Supporting players Julia Ormond and David Strathairn and star Claire Danes all won for <em>Grandin</em>, as did director Mick Jackson and the telemovie itself, as best movie. Other noteworthy triumphs last night included ABC's <em>Modern Family,</em> winning for script, supporting actor Eric Stonestreet, and outstanding comedy; <em>Glee</em>, winning for supporting actress Jane Lynch, guest actor Neil Patrick Harris and director (series creator Ryan Murphy); <em>Mad Men</em>, which won for writing and, for the third year in a row, for outstanding drama; and <em>Breaking Bad</em>, where Aaron Paul won for supporting actor and Bryan Cranston, for the third year in a row, won as outstanding actor.</p>

<p>Surprises included Kyra Sedgwick winning for <em>The Closer</em> as outstanding dramatic actress, Edie Falco winning for outstanding comedic actress for <em>Nurse Jackie</em> (Even she was susprised: "I'm not funny"), and, again deservedly, Jim Parsons as outstanding comic actor for <em>The Big Bang Theory.</em></p>

<p>The Emmys themselves ended on time, were fast-moving and rather entertaining, and even the clips were selected and presented intelligently. The only misstep were the jokes recited as winners came up to the stage -- too hard to hear, and seldom worth the effort. But for a three-hour show that handed out 28 prime-time awards and acknowledged a few more, it's ridiculous to complain. This year's Emmy telecast was a solid success, as was host Jimmy Fallon, who had energy to spare from the film-to-live opening segment on.</p>

<p>In what I'm fairly certain is unprecedented in the annals of TV criticism, I'm proud to steer you towards a father-son tag-team review -- specifically, to my son Mark, whose own review of the Emmys focuses specifically on host Jimmy Fallon. You can read it (once he files it; he's not as fast as his dad, yet) by clicking <a href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/contributors/2010/08/at-the-emmys-the-winner-is-fir.shtml">HERE.</a></p>

<p>And as an added bonus, another writer on this site, Eric Gould, chimed in with a surprise delivery this morning -- his own take on the Emmys, for which I thank him. And in which he thanks me, and almost everybody else. You can read that one <a href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/contributors/2010/08/id-like-to-thank-the-academy-a.shtml">HERE.</a></p>

<p>Also, Ed Bark, on his own Uncle Barky website, was ambitious enough to watch both the NBC telecast AND the network's official, different webcast -- so we share that insightful column (as usual) with our readers <a href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/contributors/2010/08/assessing-the-emmy-telecast-an.shtml">HERE</a>, as well as on the Contributors blog and on Ed's own blog page here at TVWW. Then finally, there's our other Ed, Ed Martin, who decided to weigh in, too. His contribution can be found <a href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/contributors/2010/08/jimmy-fallon-pumps-up-an-excep.shtml">HERE.</a></p>

<p>And on Tuesday, I'll tally up the winners among both the critics and readers, to figure out who gets to boast, who gets a prize -- and who, around here in our ranks, has some 'splainin' to do...<br />
     </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>And the Emmy Goes to... Well, for Now, We&apos;re Just Guessing -- and So Can You</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/and-the-emmy-goes-to-well-for.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.tvworthwatching.com,2010:/blog//1.3045</id>

    <published>2010-08-27T08:25:03Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-29T01:53:07Z</updated>

    <summary>[UPDATE: Predictions added by another TVWW contributor, plus a link to a USA Today Emmy story MENTIONING us at TVWW!...]
&quot;The 62nd Annual Prime-Time Emmy Awards,&quot; with host Jimmy Fallon, will be televised on NBC Sunday night at 8 ET. Until then, it&apos;s anybody&apos;s guess who will win in the major categories -- so we here at TV WORTH WATCHING thought it would be fun to have anybody guess. We&apos;ll start with some of our correspondents, who are fighting for bragging rights. Then we&apos;ll open it up to you, for your OWN bragging rights, plus some tacky TV prize...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Bianculli</name>
        <uri>http://www.tvworthwatching.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="emmys-fallon.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/27/emmys-fallon.jpg" width="505" height="222" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p><em>The 62nd Annual Prime-Time Emmy Awards,</em> with host Jimmy Fallon, will be televised on NBC Sunday night at 8 ET. Until then, it's anybody's guess who will win in the major categories -- so we here at TV WORTH WATCHING thought it would be fun to have anybody guess. We'll start with some of our correspondents, who are fighting for bragging rights. Then we'll open it up to you, for your OWN bragging rights, plus some tacky TV prize to be named later...</p>

<p>[<u>UPDATE</u>: Friday's <em>USA Today</em> features an Emmy advance article by Marco R. della Cava which both quotes me and credits TV WORTH WATCHING.  Thanks, Marco! Read it <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/televisionawards/emmys/2010-08-27-emmyfallon27_ST_N.htm">HERE...</a>]</p>

<p>Now that the website has been relaunched for, oh, almost a week, I thought I'd provide not only my own predictions for the winners of the top six categories, but those of others here at TVWW as well. Some were vacationing, and others were, let's just say, less than eager.</p>

<p>("Hell," Eric Mink wrote me in what he may have mistakenly thought was a private message, "even when I WATCHED everything, my Emmy predictions were always wrong!" By the way, I worked alongside the guy. They weren't.)</p>

<p>But I did get seven to play along -- managing editor Diane Werts, and correspondents P.J. Bednarski, Mark Bianculli, Tom Brinkmoeller (the Bs were well-accounted for), Eric Gould, Ed Martin and Alan Pergament. [<em>Actually, there are eight: Theresa Corigliano slipped in tardily, but still welcomed.</em>] Counting me, that's enough for a quorum, so let's see who's predicting what. And, because these folks are writers, expect commentary as well as votes. Some voted only in some categories, or only for winner, or only for whom they wanted to win. Others, after supplying their predictions, just kept writing.</p>

<p>In fact, three of them -- P.J., Mark, and Ed -- wrote such lengthy commentaries that they qualify as separate blogs. So, in addition to tallying their votes here, that's how I decided to publish them. On their own column pages here on TVWW, as well as on the overall Contributors blog, check out their comments, and reasoning, in their individual blog postings. We want you to get comfortable checking out the entire home page, and here's another good reason. Three of them, actually.</p>

<p>And when you're done reading the overall predictions here, feel free to add your own predictions. Just do it before 8 p.m. ET Sunday, or it won't be impressive -- and it won't count.</p>

<p>Here goes:</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="mad-men-01.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/27/mad-men-01.jpg" width="200" height="150" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; padding: 0 0 5px 10px;"/></span>

<p><big><big><big><u>OUTSTANDING DRAMA SERIES</u></big></big></big><br />
<big>Nominees:</big> <em>Breaking Bad, Dexter, The Good Wife, Lost, Mad Men, True Blood</em></p>

<p><big>P.J. Bednarski--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>The Good Wife</em><br />
WILL WIN: <em>Mad Men</em></p>

<p><big>David Bianculli--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>Breaking Bad, Dexter</em> and <em>Mad Men</em> all had fabulous, win-worthy seasons. <br />
WILL WIN: <em>Mad Men</em></p>

<p><big>Mark Bianculli--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>Mad Men</em><br />
WILL WIN: <em>Mad Men</em></p>

<p><big>Bill Brioux--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>Dexter</em> and <em>Breaking Bad </em>had electrifying finales, but <em>Mad Men </em>ended a marriage, dissolved an ad agency and assassinated a president.<br />
WILL WIN: <em>Lost,</em> for six years viewers will never get back. Now that's drama!</p>

<p><big>Theresa Corigliano--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>The Good Wife</em></p>

<p><big>Eric Gould--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>Mad Men</em>, perhaps the most adult, believable drama since <em>thirtysomething</em>. I miss Miles.<br />
WILL WIN: <em>Mad Men</em></p>

<p><big>Ed Martin--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>Mad Men</em><br />
WILL WIN: <em>Mad Men</em></p>

<p><big>Alan Pergament--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>Mad Men</em><br />
WILL WIN: <em>Lost</em></p>

<p><big>Diane Werts--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>Dexter</em>. Or <em>Breaking Bad</em>. I implore you Emmy people!<br />
WILL WIN: But sigh, I suspect it'll be more so-sleek, so-cold <em>Mad Men.</em></p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="curb-your-enthusiasm-09-O25.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/27/curb-your-enthusiasm-09-O25.jpg" width="170" height="135" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; padding: 0 0 5px 10px;"/></span>

<p><big><big><big><u>OUTSTANDING COMEDY SERIES</u></big></big></big><br />
<big>Nominees:</big> <em>Curb Your Enthusiasm, Glee, Modern Family, Nurse Jackie, The Office, 30 Rock</em></p>

<p><big>P.J. Bednarski--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>30 Rock</em><br />
WILL WIN: <em>Curb Your Enthusiasm</em></p>

<p><big>David Bianculli--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>Curb Your Enthusiasm,</em> for its brilliant faux <em>Seinfeld</em> reunion - though <em>Glee</em> and <em>Modern Family,</em> in different ways, were brilliant, too.<br />
WILL WIN: <em>Modern Family</em></p>

<p><big>Mark Bianculli--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>Glee</em><br />
WILL WIN: <em>Glee</em></p>

<p><big>Tom Brinkmoeller--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>30 Rock</em><br />
WILL WIN: <em>Modern Family</em></p>

<p><big>Bill Brioux--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: The other week I was watching TV episodes off the monitor in the seatback of an airplane. Earphones on, I was laughing out loud and didn’t realize it, until the flight attendant stopped by. "Oh, no wonder," she said. "You're watching <em>Modern Family.</em>"<br />
WILL WIN: <em>Modern Family,</em> with points to <em>Curb</em> for those funny <em>Seinfeld </em>reunion shows. Not funny: omitting <em>The Big Bang Theory.</em></p>

<p><big>Theresa Corigliano--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>Big Bang Theory (Oh, right, they don't allow write-in votes... so, ok, Nurse Jackie)</em></p>

<p><big>Eric Gould--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>Curb Your Enthusiasm</em> -- Just smarter, and it's time to thank the smartest self-made pariah since John Cleese... just not as silly.<br />
WILL WIN: Utter toss-up here, so I'll go with most jokes per square inch, <em>30 Rock.</em></p>

<p><br />
<big>Ed Martin--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>Modern Family</em><br />
WILL WIN: <em>Glee</em></p>

<p><big>Alan Pergament--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>30 Rock</em><br />
WILL WIN: <em>Modern Family</em></p>

<p><big>Diane Werts--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: If Emmy wants to honor <em>Glee</em>, this looks like the place -- if voters consider it a comedy. That's fine by me. <br />
WILL WIN: But I wouldn't be surprised to see them support the "real" comedy of <em>Modern Family. </em></p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="breaking-bad-09-My31-sf.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/27/breaking-bad-09-My31-sf.jpg" width="170" height="135" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; padding: 0 0 5px 10px;"/></span>

<p><big><big><big><u>OUTSTANDING ACTOR, DRAMA SERIES</u></big></big></big><br />
<big>Nominees:</big> <em>Kyle Chandler, Friday Night Lights; Bryan Cranston, Breaking Bad; Matthew Fox, Lost; Jon Hamm, Mad Men; Michael C. Hall, Dexter; Hugh Laurie, House</em></p>

<p><big>P.J. Bednarski--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Bryan Cranston<br />
WILL WIN: Kyle Chandler</p>

<p><big>David Bianculli--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Honestly, everyone in this category astounded me last season. Everyone.<br />
WILL WIN: Cranston, again.</p>

<p><big>Mark Bianculli--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: My heart wants Cranston for the three-peat.<br />
WILL WIN: My head says Laurie will be recognized for a particularly difficult season.</p>

<p><big>Bill Brioux--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Matthew Morrison should have been saluted here, instead of in comedy, after that terrifyingly real marital meltdown scene that yanked <em>Glee</em> off a campy cliff.<br />
WILL WIN: Bryan Cranston, scary good as always in <em>Breaking Bad.</em></p>

<p><big>Theresa Corigliano--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Hugh Laurie (is anybody watching what he does?)</p>

<p><big>Eric Gould--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Jon Hamm, for Don Draper's multi-headed Hydra... a riddle inside a mystery.<br />
WILL WIN: Jon Hamm. Three years of amazing work.</p>

<p><big>Ed Martin--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Jon Hamm<br />
WILL WIN: If Michael C. Hall is ever to receive an Emmy for his work on <em>Dexter</em> it will happen this Sunday...</p>

<p><big>Alan Pergament--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Michael C. Hall<br />
WILL WIN: Jon Hamm</p>

<p><big>Diane Werts--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Every nominee knocked it out of the park.<br />
WILL WIN: Hugh Laurie might win for <em>House</em> being bad/good/bad, and that would be good/good/good.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="damages-10-F22.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/27/damages-10-F22.jpg" width="200" height="150" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; padding: 0 0 5px 10px;"/></span>

<p><big><big><big><u>OUTSTANDING ACTRESS, DRAMA SERIES</u></big></big></big><br />
<big>Nominees:</big> <em>Connie Britton, Friday Night Lights; Glenn Close, Damages; Mariska Hargitay, Law & Order: Special Victims Unit; January Jones, Mad Men; Julianna Margulies, The Good Wife; Kyra Sedgwick, The Closer</em></p>

<p><big>P.J. Bednarski--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Julianna Margulies<br />
WILL WIN: January Jones</p>

<p><big>David Bianculli--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Connie Britton -- finally, much too tardily nominated.<br />
WILL WIN: Julianna Margulies, in a relative upset over Glenn Close </p>

<p><big>Mark Bianculli--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Julianna Margulies <br />
WILL WIN: Julianna Margulies. This one's a no-brainer (hopefully, or I'll look very stupid). Hottest new drama. Hottest new character. Margulies is wonderful (and beautiful) in everything she's in. Time for a second Emmy.</p>

<p><big>Bill Brioux--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: A few seasons ago, Julianna Margulies was miscast as an unsympathetic superwoman in <em>Canterbury's Law.</em> Perfectly cast as <em>The Good Wife</em>, she brought grace, edge and courage to a complicated character.<br />
WILL WIN: Close, but no cigar.</p>

<p><big>Theresa Corigliano--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Julianna Margulies (she had me at the pilot)</p>

<p><big>Eric Gould--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Mariska Haritgay. If outstanding makes you believe, then I believe, every time, even within some of the dopier plots.<br />
WILL WIN: Mariska Hargitay</p>

<p><big>Ed Martin--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Kyra Sedgwick, Connie Britton<br />
WILL WIN: If anyone is going to block the formidable Glenn Close of <em>Damages</em> from a third consecutive win, it's <em>Good Wife</em> star Julianna Margulies.</p>

<p><big>Alan Pergament--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Connie Britton<br />
WILL WIN: Julianna Margulies</p>

<p><big>Diane Werts--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Julianna Margulies did wonders with the least showy role in the group...<br />
WILL WIN: ...And I'd be amazed if Emmy didn't recognize that.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="30-rock-10-F11-jon-bon-jovi.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/27/30-rock-10-F11-jon-bon-jovi.jpg" width="200" height="150" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; padding: 0 0 5px 10px;"/></span>

<p><big><big><big><u>OUTSTANDING ACTOR, COMEDY SERIES</u></big></big></big><br />
<big>Nominees:</big> <em>Alec Baldwin, 30 Rock; Steve Carell, The Office; Larry David, Curb Your Enthusiasm; Matthew Morrison, Glee; Jim Parsons, The Big Bang Theory; Tony Shalhoub, Monk</em></p>

<p><big>P.J. Bednarski--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Alec Baldwin<br />
WILL WIN: Matthew Morrison</p>

<p><big>David Bianculli--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Alec Baldwin and Jim Parsons are equally astounding.<br />
WILL WIN: Let's shake things up: In the biggest surprise of the night, Parsons.</p>

<p><big>Mark Bianculli--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Parsons seems to be the easy fan favorite in this one...<br />
WILL WIN: ...But I doubt the Academy will forget just what a true master of comedy Alec Baldwin has consistently proven to be.</p>

<p><big>Tom Brinkmoeller--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Jim Parsons<br />
WILL WIN: Alec Baldwin</p>

<p><big>Bill Brioux--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Sheldon Cooper is a narcissist know-it-all and yet Parsons finds a way to make him sympathetic if not quite loveable. That's quantum physics.<br />
WILL WIN: Alec Baldwin. Hey, he's Alec Baldwin.</p>

<p><big>Theresa Corigliano--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Jim Parsons... Jim Parsons... Jim Parsons</p>

<p><big>Eric Gould--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Probably Steve Carell: Even though <em>The Office</em> has run out of steam, he hasn't, and his talent is at the top of this heap, if edging out Baldwin only by a lash.<br />
WILL WIN: Alec Baldwin</p>

<p><big>Ed Martin--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Jim Parsons<br />
WILL WIN: Alec Baldwin, Tony Shalhoub. I'm calling this one a toss-up. </p>

<p><big>Alan Pergament--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Jim Parsons<br />
WILL WIN: Alec Baldwin</p>

<p><big>Diane Werts--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Please, oh please, give Jim Parsons his due. (Do voters think he IS his character?)<br />
WILL WIN: But I suspect they'll give a big wet goodbye kiss to Tony Shalhoub.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="united-states-of-tara-09-F0.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/27/united-states-of-tara-09-F0.jpg" width="170" height="135" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; padding: 0 0 5px 10px;"/></span>

<p><big><big><big><u>OUTSTANDING ACTRESS, COMEDY SERIES</u></big></big></big><br />
<big>Nominees:</big> <em>Toni Collette, The United States of Tara; Edie Falco, Nurse Jackie; Tina Fey, 30 Rock; Julia Louis-Dreyfus, The New Adventures of Old Christine; Lea Michele, Glee; Amy Poehler, Parks and Recreation</em></p>

<p><big>P.J. Bednarski--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Tina Fey<br />
WILL WIN: Julia Louis-Dreyfus</p>

<p><big>David Bianculli--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Toni Collette<br />
WILL WIN: Toni Collette. Hell, she could take home FIVE Emmys -- one for each alter ego -- and still have additional characters in her arsenal.</p>

<p><big>Mark Bianculli--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Edie Falco<br />
WILL WIN: Edie Falco. Since it's specifically an "actress" award, I think it would take a miracle to beat the likes of Edie Falco (...a miracle, or Toni Collette).</p>

<p><big>Tom Brinkmoeller--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Julia Louis-Dreyfus<br />
WILL WIN: Lea Michele</p>

<p><big>Bill Brioux--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: <em>Glee</em>'s breakout star Jane Lynch, not even nominated here. C'mon, Lea Michele is in this category and Lynch is relegated to supporting actress? That's not how Sue C's it. The others are all funny ladies but, as Sue would say, nobody watches their shows.<br />
WILL WIN: Tina Fey. And why not?</p>

<p><big>Theresa Corigliano--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Edie Falco</p>

<p><big>Eric Gould--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Toni Collette, for playing not just one character, but six. That's six Emmys.<br />
WILL WIN: Toni Collette</p>

<p><big>Ed Martin--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Edie Falco<br />
WILL WIN: Edie Falco. With her work on <em>Nurse Jackie</em>, she has done something I didn't think possible -- she has shoved aside all memories of her career-defining role as Carmela Soprano. </p>

<p><big>Alan Pergament--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Edie Falco<br />
WILL WIN: Edie Falco</p>

<p><big>Diane Werts--</big><br />
SHOULD WIN: Julia Louis-Dreyfus<br />
WILL WIN: Edie Falco, Toni Collette</p>

<p>--</p>

<p>Those are theirs. Now how about yours? You can vote only once -- and if you can figure out some other way to cheat, don't bother. The prizes, whatever they are, won't be worth it. And besides, I'm behind in mailing out the LAST prizes, though I've contacted those winners to apologize.</p>

<p>This website relaunching stuff takes time. So, it turns out, does tabulating Emmy predictions (he types, at 4:25 a.m. ET)...</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Digging Deep Into This Site, for Another Old Ray Recchi Story... And One of Mine</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/digging-deep-into-this-site-fo.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.tvworthwatching.com,2010:/blog//1.3043</id>

    <published>2010-08-26T14:30:41Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-26T14:22:33Z</updated>

    <summary>Yesterday&apos;s post, on why I love BBC America&apos;s &quot;The Choir&quot; and Fox&apos;s &quot;Glee&quot;, gave me the excuse to print a classic vintage column by my old friend and mentor, the late Ray Recchi, on the importance of music education in schools. And it reminded me -- hiding deep within this site is another of my favorite Recchi columns, on which he reviewed... me... and my one and only attempt at doing stand-up at a comedy club...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Bianculli</name>
        <uri>http://www.tvworthwatching.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
Yesterday's post, on why I love BBC America's <em>The Choir</em> and Fox's <em>Glee</em>, gave me the excuse to print a classic vintage column by my old friend and mentor, the late Ray Recchi, on the importance of music education in schools. And it reminded me -- hiding deep within this site is another of my favorite Recchi columns, on which he reviewed... me... and my one and only attempt at doing stand-up at a comedy club...</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="comedy-is-not-pretty.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/26/comedy-is-not-pretty.jpg" width="405" height="279" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; padding: 0 0 5px 10px;"/></span>

<p>It's a way to give you another taste of why I admired Ray so much. And also, as a happy side benefit, to encourage you to explore our newly redesigned site, and poke into some of its deeper tunnels and caves. So instead of giving you an easy link here, I'll give directions instead:</p>

<p>1. Go back to the main page, which you always can do by clicking on the TV WORTH WATCHING banner at the top of any page.</p>

<p>2. Scroll down to the bottom of the page -- beneath my blog, beneath the best bets, beneath the featured video, beneath the week's list of new DVDs (where you'll notice, if you leave your cursor parked on them for a second, mini-descriptions and mini-reviews will pop up in otherwise hidden text). There, you'll find a quartet of BUT WAIT! THERE'S MORE! treats, one of which is THE MORGUE.  Click on that puppy.</p>

<p>3.  The first two stories you'll encounter there are the ones I'm pointing you to today. The first is my own first-person account of preparing for, and performing, for a comedy routine 30 years ago -- and the second is Ray's review of my performance. Both stories ran in the Fort Lauderdale News/Sun-Sentinel as a package.</p>

<p>And since then, by the way, I've stuck with writing...</p>

<p> </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Why I Watch BBC America&apos;s &quot;The Choir&quot; with Glee -- and Enjoy &quot;Glee&quot; Just as Much</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/why-i-watch-bbc-americas-the-c.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.tvworthwatching.com,2010:/blog//1.3042</id>

    <published>2010-08-25T12:45:32Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-25T13:12:43Z</updated>

    <summary>Wednesday night at 10 p.m. ET, BBC America presents the latest installment of &quot;The Choir,&quot; a fabulous show presenting optimistic choirmaster Gareth Malone and his tireless efforts to introduce music, and music education, to British schools devoid of both. This Sunday, Fox&apos;s &quot;Glee&quot; is up for a bunch of Emmy awards, and already has picked up one well-deserved statuette, for Neil Patrick Harris&apos; stellar guest turn as an old alumnus of a high-school performing arts program. As an even older alumnus of just such a program, I&apos;m a sucker for both these shows...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Bianculli</name>
        <uri>http://www.tvworthwatching.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="choir-gareth-albert-hall.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/25/choir-gareth-albert-hall.jpg" width="505" height="283" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>Wednesday night at 10 p.m. ET, BBC America presents the latest installment of <em>The Choir</em>, a fabulous show presenting optimistic choirmaster Gareth Malone (above) and his tireless efforts to introduce music, and music education, to British schools devoid of both.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="glee-dream-on-top.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/25/glee-dream-on-top.jpg" width="250" height="179" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>This Sunday, Fox's <em>Glee</em> is up for a bunch of Emmy awards, and already has picked up one well-deserved statuette, for Neil Patrick Harris' stellar guest turn as an old alumnus of a high-school performing arts program. As an even older alumnus of just such a program, I'm a sucker for both these shows...</p>

<p>What <em>Glee</em> does, week in and week out (for now, Fox is double-pumping reruns of the musical series to fill its Tuesday prime-time summer schedule), is present both the joy and passion of music and the wildly individual characters represented in any sort of artistic high-school endeavor. It;s scripted, but it works.</p>

<p>And what <em>The Choir</em> does, each week, is show the real thing: Youngsters -- some introverted but talented, others outgoing but hostile -- being herded into a coherent unit, making music that inspires not only them, but their parents and friends. And, I promise, anyone who tunes in.</p>

<p>Both shows have an overt message that I hope is being absorbed, even if subliminally: That music education programs, at the high-school and even grade-school level, are things to be thought of not as expendable frivolities, but as educational necessities. Copies of <em>The Choir</em> should be sent to every school board in America. So should copies of a newspaper article written by a friend of mine more than a decade ago -- an article that, unfortunately, still rings just as true.</p>

<p>Ray Recchi was my boss and mentor when I got to the <em>Ft. Lauderdale News</em> in 1977, the guy who taught me how to find my voice as a columnist -- and, perhaps no less important, how to walk through a newsroom with a full cup of coffee without spilling any. (Never look at it. It works.)</p>

<p>By the time I left that paper in 1980, Ray had "demoted" himself to columnist to enjoy life more, we had become close friends, and the paper itself had become the <em>Sun-Sentinel</em>. Ray died more than a decade ago, but one of his columns just resurfaced.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="rayrecchi.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/25/rayrecchi.jpg" width="138" height="144" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>It was recirculated on the email forum of the Hall/Hill Performing Arts, the South Florida <em>Glee</em>-ish group of which I once was a member (mostly offstage, blessedly, as lighting designer and such), whose home website, run by surviving teacher Allen Hill, can be found <a href="http://www.hhpa.biz/">HERE.</a></p>

<p>When I read that article, it made me miss Ray (seen here with Buffie Blakeslee Peter, one of the youngest members of our company when we first started staging musicals at Nova High School), and envy his breezy writing style, all over again. But it also made me think of <em>The Choir</em>, and <em>Glee,</em> and the sorry state of most music education today.</p>

<p>Which is why I'm happy -- honored -- to reprint it here. Thanks, Ray...</p>

<p><big><big><big><big>Music Is Not Dessert</big></big></big></big></p>

<p><big><big><em>By RAY RECCHI, Lifestyle Columnist, Fort Lauderdale, Florida</em></big></big></p>

<p>For me, music has never been dessert. It has always been one of the main courses.</p>

<p>I wake up to music, listen to it as I drive to work and hum while I'm working. Even when I'm silent, a melody is running through my head. (At the moment, it is a Scott Joplin rag, for reasons unknown even to me.)</p>

<p>My father made his living as a musician. It also was his hobby. For years, I made my living writing about music, which was my hobby, too. All three of my children play musical instruments and spend a lot of time making and listening to music. I'm proud of that.</p>

<p>Even for those whose lives are less involved with it, however, music is not merely something pleasant to listen to while driving, shopping or jogging, although it fulfills those purposes. It is humanizing. It is a form of communication that brings people together in a way that can transcend words, races, religions and ideologies.</p>

<p>And the more you know about it, the more beautiful it is -- not just the sound of it, but the structure of it, indeed the very idea of it.</p>

<p>What's more, one cannot seriously study music without learning about math, languages, history, anthropology and several other subjects. A music student also learns self-discipline, responsibility and dedication.</p>

<p>So it confounds and angers me that whenever we need to put the education budget on a diet, people regard music as dessert instead of the healthy main course that it is.</p>

<p>And with all the talk of budget cuts in education these days, you can't blame music teachers for feeling a bit paranoid.</p>

<p>In an effort to blunt the expected assault on music programs, the theme of the Florida Music Educations Association convention in Tampa last weekend was "Music makes the difference." The group's message was that music is not a frill, but is basic to education.</p>

<p>Obviously, many would argue with that. The philosophy of the "no frills" faction is that math, science, English and history are the only basics. The arts, they say, are extras.</p>

<p>I can't help but think, however, that if music were simply to disappear, those people might change their tune. Fortunately, that won't happen. Music and the people who make and teach it will go on in spite of all those who have little or no respect for them.</p>

<p>Ironically, that is also the problem. Music is such a big part of our lives that people tend to take it for granted. Because part of the beauty of music is that, even though it is a main course, it tastes like dessert.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>More Relaunch News, Radio and Newspaper Stuff, and Thoughts on Early Emmy Winners</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/more-relaunch-news-radio-and-n.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.tvworthwatching.com,2010:/blog//1.3040</id>

    <published>2010-08-24T13:30:03Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-24T13:47:58Z</updated>

    <summary>Lots to cover, so let&apos;s dive right in, beginning with more relaunch news.

Your reaction to our Extreme Makeover (TV WORTH WATCHING as &quot;The Swan&quot;?) has been warm, thoughtful and encouraging. I expected nothing less, but thanks just the same.

And in that same welcoming spirit, please get in the habit of visiting, and commenting on, our new Contributors blog -- where, today, we top off three new columns written yesterday with an even newer one, today&apos;s personal essay on TV and race, written by good friend Gerald Jordan... Not to mention today&apos;s new FOR BETTER OR WERTS column by Diane Werts, in which she reviews the new &quot;Lost&quot; complete box set, and starts out by complaining about the size of the box...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Bianculli</name>
        <uri>http://www.tvworthwatching.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
Lots to cover, so let's dive right in, beginning with more relaunch news.</p>

<p>Your reaction to our Extreme Makeover (TV WORTH WATCHING as <em>The Swan</em>?) has been warm, thoughtful and encouraging. I expected nothing less, but thanks just the same.</p>

<p>And in that same welcoming spirit, please get in the habit of visiting, and commenting on, our new Contributors blog -- where, today, we top off three new columns written yesterday with an even newer one, a personal essay on TV and race, written by good friend Gerald Jordan...</p>

<p>Not to mention today's new FOR BETTER OR WERTS column by Diane Werts, in which she reviews the new <em>Lost </em>complete box set, and starts out by complaining about the size of the box...</p>

<p>--</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="hot-in-clevelandjpg-638d58c.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/24/hot-in-clevelandjpg-638d58c.jpg" width="325" height="216" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>Then there are two thoughtful articles on the state of TV comedy, and the resurgence of what might be called "retro TV" (i.e., TV Land's <em>Hot in Cleveland</em>), written by <em>Cleveland Plain Dealer</em> TV critic Mark Dawidziak. He's a guy I'd love to have writing for this site, but he's not cooperating, because he stubbornly remains employed by his newspaper. (Hey, SOMEBODY has to.)</p>

<p>But here are links to his two just-published stories, which I pass along not only because they're good, but because -- Vanity Alert! -- they both quote me, extensively and accurately, and credit TV WORTH WATCHING as well. It's part of my glacial plan for TVWW global domination. Today, Cleveland.... tomorrow, Akron!</p>

<p>Read his story on the state of the modern sitcom <a href="http://www.cleveland.com/tv-blog/index.ssf/2010/08/death_of_sitcoms_it_turns_out_was_greatly_exaggerated.html">HERE</a>, and his story on TV "comfort food" <a href="http://www.cleveland.com/tv-blog/index.ssf/2010/08/television_shows_draw_on_familiar_programs_of_the_past.html">HERE</a>.</p>

<p>--</p>

<p>And I was too frazzled to mention it yesterday (Monday), when it happened, but NPR's <em>Fresh Air with Terry Gross</em> aired my report on this week's fifth-anniversary Hurricane Katrina stories. Even if you missed, or don't want to see, some of the programs discussed, you might want to check out the audio clips, which I featured extensively.</p>

<p>You can read, and hear, the story by clicking <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129330031">HERE</a> (I highly recommend listening to, not just reading, this one; it's the clips that make it). Or you can also get there by clicking FRESH AIR on our TVWW orange navigation bar, which takes you straight to NPR's archive of my <em>Fresh Air</em> reports. If you're too tired to scroll up, you can also click <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/archives/archive.php?thingId=2101612">HERE.</a></p>

<p>--</p>

<p>And finally, there are the Creative Arts Emmys, which are handed out a week in advance of Sunday's actual prime-time Emmy Awards. So we already know, for example, the results to some of my favorite Emmy races each year, the ones where actors compete for best guest performances in drama and comedy series.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="glee-harris-and-sue-w-brian.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/24/glee-harris-and-sue-w-brian.jpg" width="275" height="206" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>The winners for comedy, this year, were Betty White, for her turn at hosting NBC's <em>Saturday Night Live</em>, and Neil Patrick Harris, for his spectacular performance as Will's former glee-group role model on Fox's <em>Glee.</em></p>

<p>Harris also won in a "special class" program category, winning an Emmy for his hosting chores at the Tony Awards. He deserves both, so that's pretty cool. And White, winning her fifth Emmy at age 88 -- that's even cooler.</p>

<p>In drama, the guest actor winners were John Lithgow for his creepy serial killer on Showtime's <em>Dexter</em> (yes!) and Ann-Margret, winning for a guest role on NBC's <em>Law & Order: Special Victims Unit. </em></p>

<p>But reflect, for a moment, on just how deeply competitive these categories are -- and, by inference, how good TV has gotten at luring excellent actors and actresses for meaty but short-term roles.</p>

<p>No question, Lithgow deserves his statuette for best guest actor in a drama series. But in so doing, he beat out, among others, Ted Danson as the arrogant Arthur Frobisher in FX's <em>Damages</em>,  Alan Cumming's smarmy Eli Gold in CBS's <em>The Good Wife</em>, and Robert Morse's Bertram Cooper in AMC's <em>Mad Men.</em></p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="lost-09-sf-juliet-w-bomb.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/24/lost-09-sf-juliet-w-bomb.jpg" width="205" height="150" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>In the guest actress category for drama, Ann-Marget beat out several nominees who, in my opinion, were more deserving of a win.</p>

<p>Specifically, think of Elizabeth Mitchell as the lovable Juliet on ABC's <em>Lost</em>, Lily Tomlin as the despicable Marilyn Tobin on <em>Damages,</em> and both Mary Kay Place and Sissy Spacek of HBO's <em>Big Love.</em></p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="betty-white.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/24/betty-white.jpg" width="225" height="131" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; padding: 0 0 5px 10px;"/></span>

<p>On the comedy side, the riches are just as pronounced.</p>

<p>Betty White, 2010's TV "It Girl," beat out such powerhouse women as Elaine Stritch -- at age 85, a relative ingenue -- for her recurring role as Jack's overbearing mom on NBC's <em>30 Rock.</em> And Kristin Chenoweth, whose guest-star turn on <em>Glee </em>was just as electrifying as male winner Harris'. And Christine Baranski, who was a riot as Beverly, Leonard's mom, on CBS's <em>The Big Bang Theory</em>.</p>

<p>As for the men, Harris triumphed over Fred Willard as Frank on ABC's <em>Modern Family</em>, and, among others, <em>Mad Men</em> star Jon Hamm for his delightful moonlighting role as Drew, Liz Lemon's neighbor and potential boyfriend, on <em>30 Rock.</em></p>

<p>Good stuff. Which, after all, is precisely what the Emmys are supposed to be about: reminding us of how good TV can be. So why wasn't this part of the ceremony televised?</p>

<p>Turns out it will be: the E! Entertainment network is televising a taped version of the Creative Arts awards show on Friday, Aug. 27, two days before the prime-time Emmys are presented live by NBC. But if you're looking for it, look hard: E! is showing that ceremony at 1 p.m. ET.</p>

<p>After all, if E! would televise some of TV's best actors, actresses and offerings in prime time on Friday, it'd have to bump... <em>Jerseylicious.</em></p>

<p></p>

<p> </p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
 </p>

<p>  </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Relaunch is Here! The Relaunch is Here!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/the-relaunch-is-here-the-relau.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.tvworthwatching.com,2010:/blog//1.3037</id>

    <published>2010-08-23T01:33:18Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-23T02:20:50Z</updated>

    <summary>If you&apos;ve been here before, you should already be able to tell, just from first glance, how different things look around here, and how hard we&apos;ve worked to make &quot;TV WORTH WATCHING: The Next Generation&quot; an even more compelling place to visit for all things related to quality television. And if you&apos;re a new visitor, welcome. This is a place where writers and readers who care about, and seek out, excellent TV, come to congregate, debate, and find new things to watch...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Bianculli</name>
        <uri>http://www.tvworthwatching.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
If you've been here before, you should already be able to tell, just from first glance, how different things look around here, and how hard we've worked to make "TV WORTH WATCHING: The Next Generation" an even more compelling place to visit for all things related to quality television. And if you're a new visitor, welcome. This is a place where writers and readers who care about, and seek out, excellent TV, come to congregate, debate, and find new things to watch...</p>

<p>The site is still in transition, but TVWW 2.0 definitely is up and running.</p>

<p>Rather than do a blow-by-blow, item-by-item list of all we've done, let me just, for today, point out the highest of highlights.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="relaunch-pic-1.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/22/relaunch-pic-1.jpg" width="300" height="347" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; padding: 0 0 5px 10px;"/></span>

<p>In addition to the two blogs that previously were showcased on the home page -- mine and Diane Werts' -- we now make room, at the bottom left, for the four most recent blogs by our contributing writers. Click on those stories, and read them on their own pages. Or click on the CONTRIBUTORS button on the navigation bar, and go to a collection of ALL contributors' blogs.</p>

<p>OR... and here's the fun part... go to the masthead on the right side of the home page, where ALL our writers are listed, along with their individual column names. Click on THOSE, and go immediately to their home pages, where every story they've written for or shared with TVWW is right there, in their own cozy space.</p>

<p>And what writers.  Counting Diane and me, there are 15 of them -- and those of you in the industry, or who have read bylines of major newspapers over the past few decades, are likely to recognize a lot of them. Ed Bark. Diane Holloway. Noel Holston. Eric Mink. And so many more... well, just read them for yourself. The roll call, AND the columns.  I couldn't be prouder of the company I'm keeping, or the website we're collectively generating.</p>

<p>Other new additions to the site are actual random bits of video (I held out long enough, but now it's easier), reviews of new and classic DVD releases (some with scroll-over hover text!), and -- but wait, there's more! There's also BUT WAIT! THERE'S MORE!, a collection of more fun stuff, from TV theme songs to my favorite <em>Fresh Air</em> reports and newspaper stories.</p>

<p>Please look around, and play around, and comment here to tell us what you think. I especially encourage you to read the other bloggers, and welcome them by commenting on whatever you find interesting, whether it's Ed Bark's review of Spike Lee's new HBO documentary or Tom Brinkmoeller's evisceration of NBC's upcoming Jimmy Smits drama...</p>

<p>And a special thanks, for their months of hard work and a Sunday of insane crash cramming, to the team that pulled this off with and for me: website designer Eric Gould (also a columnist here, as of late, and an excellent one), webmaster Rich Baniewicz, and Diane Werts, who as of today gets a much-deserved promotion, and even more work, as TVWW's managing editor.</p>

<p>And now, at about 10 p.m. ET Sunday, we're putting this puppy to bed. And then, shortly thereafter, ourselves...</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>One if By LAN, Two if By PC: &quot;The Relaunch is Coming! The Relaunch is Coming!&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/one-if-by-lan-two-if-by-pc-the.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.tvworthwatching.com,2010:/blog//1.3033</id>

    <published>2010-08-20T20:03:11Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-22T19:36:39Z</updated>

    <summary>Well, I can&apos;t begin to tell you how much work is behind us, and how much looms ahead this weekend. But we&apos;re close enough for me to announce to you, and dare us here at TV WORTH WATCHING, that we hope to have the long-promised website relaunch up and running by Monday morning...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Bianculli</name>
        <uri>http://www.tvworthwatching.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="masthead-bigger.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/22/masthead-bigger.jpg" width="505" height="69" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p><br />
Well, I can't begin to tell you how much work is behind us, and how much looms ahead this weekend. But we're close enough for me to announce to you, and dare us here at TV WORTH WATCHING, that we hope to have the long-promised website relaunch up and running by Monday morning...</p>

<p>A lot of things are still in flux, including the photo in the banner I'm displaying here, for the record. (My beard got vetoed, and is being relegated to a different page.) But I'm so, so excited about what we've done, and what we're doing, that I wanted to send out the word.</p>

<p>So if, especially on Sunday, the site is sluggish or closed down for a few hours, you'll know why. And come back Monday for the relaunch party, where we'll serve virtual beer and virtual pizza. No calories, and you can have as much as you want...</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Great New DVD Releases: Clear Eyes, Crafty Killers, Flying Squirrels</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/great-new-dvd-releases-clear-e.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.tvworthwatching.com,2010:/blog//1.3029</id>

    <published>2010-08-17T13:30:51Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-23T00:21:14Z</updated>

    <summary>This week&apos;s batch of new releases of TV shows on DVD includes an absurdly entertaining triple helping of great shows, and the range couldn&apos;t be more eclectic. Coincidentally, they&apos;re all Season Four releases - of NBC/DirecTV&apos;s &quot;Friday Night Lights,&quot; Showtime&apos;s &quot;Dexter,&quot; and the classic &quot;Rocky &amp; Bullwinkle&quot; adventures...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Bianculli</name>
        <uri>http://www.tvworthwatching.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="dexter-lithgow-hall-big.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/22/dexter-lithgow-hall-big.jpg" width="505" height="285" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>This week's batch of new releases of TV shows on DVD includes an absurdly entertaining triple helping of great shows, and the range couldn't be more eclectic. Coincidentally, they're all Season Four releases - of NBC/DirecTV's <em>Friday Night Lights</em>, Showtime's <em>Dexter</em>, and the classic <em>Rocky & Bullwinkle</em> adventures...</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="FridayNightLights_S4.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/22/FridayNightLights_S4.jpg" width="200" height="305" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>Season four of <em>Friday Night Lights</em> (Universal Home Video, 3 discs) is the season we almost didn't get to see, until NBC made a deal with DirecTV to split costs. The satellite service got the better end of the deal, and got to televise all 13 episodes before NBC began showing them. Consequently, NBC showed the finale of season four only 11 days ago -- yet here it is, available on DVD beginning today.</p>

<p>Kyle Chandler and Connie Britton, both up for Emmys this year (for the first time!), star as Eric and Tami Taylor, a high-school football coach and his high-school principal wife, living in a small, football-obsessed Texas town. <em>Friday Night Lights</em> is one of the best family drama series ever made, and the performances by the young supporting cast are strong enough to almost rival the award-worthy portrayals by the show's starring couple.</p>

<p>Coach Taylor's motto, to inspire his gritty pack of gridiron players, is an encouraging mantra for life as well as sport: "Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose." If you buy this set, you can't lose, either. You can order it <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Friday-Night-Lights-Fourth-Season/dp/B0032UYFAQ/ref=sr_1_1?s=dvd&ie=UTF8&qid=1282052328&sr=1-1&tag=tvworthwatchi-20">HERE.</a></p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="dexter-box.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/22/dexter-box.jpg" width="200" height="292" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; padding: 0 0 5px 10px;"/></span>

<p>(And remember, if you order through Amazon, via these supplied TV WORTH WATCHING links, we get a small but much-appreciated percentage of the purchase price, and of anything else you buy during that visit. Costs you nothing more. Helps us stay alive.)</p>

<p>Season four of <em>Dexter </em> (CBS/Showtime, 4 discs) is the most recent one, featuring John Lithgow in a ultra-creepy, season-long guest arc as a serial murderer who, like Michael C. Hall's Dexter, hides in plain sight. All 12 episode are here, including the cliffhanger ending that will thrust Dexter into a new orbit when the show returns on Showtime Sept. 26.</p>

<p><em>Dexter</em> is one of TV's best shows right now, and certainly one of its most unusual. Order it <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Dexter-Fourth-Michael-C-Hall/dp/B002N5N5M0/ref=sr_1_1?s=dvd&ie=UTF8&qid=1282052452&sr=1-1&tag=tvworthwatchi-20">HERE.</a> Or on Blu-Ray <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Dexter-Blu-ray-Michael-C-Hall/dp/B002JVWR0Y/ref=sr_1_2?s=dvd&ie=UTF8&qid=1282052621&sr=1-2&tag=tvworthwatchi-20">HERE.</a></p>

<p>Finally, there's a blast from the much more distant past. The "Rocky & Bullwinkle" cartoons by Jay Ward Studios, shown on TV in prime time in the late 1950s and early 1960s, have been repackaged (and retitled) by Classic Media, in season-long compilations. Originally from <em>The Bullwinkle Show,</em> this fourth season (Classic Media, 2 discs) collection, called <em>Rocky & Bullwinkle & Friends</em>, includes Rocky the flying squirrel, Bullwinkle the talking moose, cold-war spies Boris Badenov and Natasha Fatale, and so much more... "Fractured Fairy Tales," Sherman and Mr. Peabody's time travels, and... oh, just buy it.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="Boris_Badenov.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/17/Boris_Badenov.jpg" width="175" height="140" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>I was in my 20s before I learned that there was an opera, by Mussorgsky, named <em>Boris Godunov</em>, based on a real-life Russian Tsar. I've never quite looked at Boris Badenov -- or <em>Bullwinkle</em> -- the same way since. If possible, I adore them even more.</p>

<p>For the timeless, peerless season four frivolity, you can order it <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Rocky-Bullwinkle-Friends-Season-Four/dp/B003M9ZAC4/ref=sr_1_1?s=dvd&ie=UTF8&qid=1282052526&sr=1-1&tag=tvworthwatchi-20">HERE.</a></p>

<p>Three great TV series. Three great DVD releases, all on the same day. Boy, I love 21st-century technology...</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>With &quot;The Big C,&quot; Showtime Presents Another Great Actress -- But Unfortunately, This Time, Not Another Great Show</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/with-the-big-c-showtime-presen.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.tvworthwatching.com,2010:/blog//1.3028</id>

    <published>2010-08-16T15:15:15Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-16T22:44:59Z</updated>

    <summary>The addition of &quot;The Big C&quot; to Showtime&apos;s lineup (10:30 p.m. ET Monday) brings Laura Linney, a fabulous actress, to a network already boasting several excellent shows in which they star: Edie Falco in &quot;Nurse Jackie,&quot; Toni Collette in &quot;The United States of Tara,&quot; Mary-Louise Parker in &quot;Weeds.&quot; But while Linney belongs in that august company, &quot;The Big C&quot; does not...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Bianculli</name>
        <uri>http://www.tvworthwatching.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="big-c-laura-linney-at-desk.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/16/big-c-laura-linney-at-desk.jpg" width="420" height="280" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>The addition of <em>The Big C</em> to Showtime's lineup (10:30 p.m. ET Monday) brings Laura Linney, a fabulous actress, to a network already boasting several excellent shows in which they star: Edie Falco in <em>Nurse Jackie</em>, Toni Collette in <em>The United States of Tara</em>, Mary-Louise Parker in <em>Weeds</em>. But while Linney belongs in that august company, <em>The Big C</em> does not...</p>

<p>The show is worth watching, to sample, but only because of Linney's lead performance. It's textured, and subtle, and believable -- which most other elements of <em>The Big C</em> are not.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="big-c-laura-linney-oliver-p.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/16/big-c-laura-linney-oliver-p.jpg" width="300" height="222" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p><em>The Big C</em> stars Linney as Cathy, a wife, mother and high-school teacher who receives a diagnosis of terminal cancer. It's a big idea for a series, but <em>The Big C</em>, created by Darlene Hunt, aims small.</p>

<p>Prior to that diagnosis, she endured, for the most part, the overt hostility of her slacker son (Gabriel Basso), the spoiled selfishness of her childish husband (Oliver Platt), the aggressive indifference of her bored students (especially Gabourey Sidibe), the snarling rudeness of her unfriendly neighbor (Phyllis Somerville), and the taunting insults of her homeless brother (John Benjamin Hickey). After the diagnosis, she begins to become more spontaneous, outspoken and unpredictable.</p>

<p>The show itself, in its first three episodes, is not so much unpredictable as unbelievable. The homeless brother, the sassy student, the crabby neighbor -- the actors can't elevate these parts, as written, above cartoon caricatures, even though they struggle to do so. Before creating <em>The Big C</em>, one of Hunt's biggest credits was writing a few scripts for <em>90210.</em> The remake. And <em>The Big C, </em>arguably, doesn't have THAT show's depth.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="rfraiser_finale.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/16/rfraiser_finale.jpg" width="200" height="147" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; padding: 0 0 5px 10px;"/></span>

<p>But it does have Linney, who played Abigail Adams in HBO's <em>John Adams</em>, and has shone in a string of intelligent, mostly independent feature films <em>(Love Actually, Mystic River</em>), and in a recurring role as one of Kelsey Grammer's few serious girlfriends on NBC's <em>Frasier</em>. She deserves a TV series of her own to show off, and take advantage of, her talent -- but <em>The Big C</em> isn't it. Cancer survivors may find some of the humor lazy and offensive, but so may everyone else.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="weeds-mary-louise-parker-se.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/16/weeds-mary-louise-parker-se.jpg" width="300" height="170" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>Preceding <em>The Big C</em> on the Showtime lineup is the sixth-series premiere of <em>Weeds</em> (10 p.m. ET), and the difference between the two shows is obvious.</p>

<p>Mary-Louise Parker, too, is a marvelously believable actress -- one of my favorite TV performers, period. In <em>Weeds</em>, no matter how extreme and outrageous the plots get -- and they get plenty outrageous -- Parker's own reactions of incredulity, desperation and frustration, as out-of-control, drug-dealing single parent Nancy, sell the concept and keep things moving.</p>

<p>She also has a fabulous supporting cast around her, which keeps <em>Weeds</em> entertaining and fast-moving. And moving, not for the first time, is indeed the key word.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="weeds-mallet.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/16/weeds-mallet.jpg" width="225" height="128" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; padding: 0 0 5px 10px;"/></span>

<p>Once again this season, the program is rebooting itself, leaving Mexico, this time, because Nancy's son -- picking right up from last season's cliffhanger -- has just murdered a woman with a croquet mallet. Don't ask. Just watch. And enjoy.</p>

<p>With <em>The Big C</em>, you may as well watch. But except for Linney's performance, and Platt's, don't expect to enjoy.</p>

<p>You can hear my reviews of <em>The Big C</em> and <em>Weeds</em> on Monday's<em> Fresh Air with Terry Gross</em> on NPR. Or you can go to the <em>Fresh Air </em>website and both read and hear my review by clicking <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129228635&f=13&sc=tw&cc=freshair">HERE.</a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;Max Headroom&quot; Finally Arrives on Home Video -- 25 Years Into Its Future</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/max-headroom-finally-arrives-o.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.tvworthwatching.com,2010:/blog//1.2363</id>

    <published>2010-08-10T18:00:25Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-12T20:57:48Z</updated>

    <summary>When &quot;Max Headroom&quot; first hit the media landscape in 1985, it was with a two-pronged assault: a music-video series in which the &quot;computer-generated&quot; titular character introduced and often ridiculed the hot acts of the day, and a live-action sci-fi movie explaining the &quot;origin&quot; of &quot;Max Headroom.&quot;

That movie, like the subsequent 1987 live-action ABC drama series also called &quot;Max Headroom,&quot; was set &quot;20 minutes into the future.&quot; Now, a full 25 years after he first appeared on England&apos;s Channel 4, &quot;Max Headroom&quot; finally shows up on home video...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Bianculli</name>
        <uri>http://www.tvworthwatching.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="MaxHeadroom.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/10/MaxHeadroom.jpg" width="420" height="316" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>When <em>Max Headroom</em> first hit the media landscape in 1985, it was with a two-pronged assault: a music-video series in which the "computer-generated" titular character introduced and often ridiculed the hot acts of the day, and a live-action sci-fi movie explaining the "origin" of Max Headroom.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="max-headroom-edison-w-camer.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/10/max-headroom-edison-w-camer.jpg" width="250" height="200" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>That movie, like the subsequent 1987 live-action ABC drama series also called <em>Max Headroom</em>, was set "20 minutes into the future." Now, a full 25 years after he first appeared on England's Channel 4, <em>Max Headroom</em> finally shows up on home video...</p>

<p>The August 10 release, from Shout! Video in collaboration with Warner Bros. Entertainment, is a five-DVD set called <em>Max Headroom: The Complete Series. </em>On four discs, it presents the American version of the <em>Max Headroom</em> pilot, and all subsequent 13 episodes produced for ABC in 1987-88 -- including one episode, "Baby Grobags," not televised for another seven years.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="max-headroom-jeff-tambor.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/10/max-headroom-jeff-tambor.jpg" width="250" height="200" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; padding: 0 0 5px 10px;"/></span>

<p>The fifth disc is full of DVD extras, including a reunion with most of the show's cast, including Jeffrey Tambor, who co-starred here long before becoming a cult TV star thanks to HBO's <em>The Larry Sanders Show</em> and Fox's <em>Arrested Development.</em> (Missing from the reunion, sadly, is series star Matt Frewer, who played both Edison Carter and Max Headroom.)</p>

<p>For genre fans, it's a must-buy DVD purchase, and you can -- and should -- order it <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Max-Headroom-Complete-Lenticular-Cover/dp/B00005JNU5/ref=sr_1_1?s=dvd&ie=UTF8&qid=1281456689&sr=1-1&tag=tvworthwatchi-20">HERE.</a></p>

<p>The ABC series really was decades ahead of its time, and tackled lots of questions about what TV was doing to viewers, and what greedy TV executives were doing to their own medium. A subplot in the TV movie that launched the series, for example, concerned "blipverts," the devious brainchild of executives at the globally dominant Network 23. "Blipverts" were subliminal commercials, run so quickly that no viewer could fast-forward through them. Another plot had a rival pay-per-view TV operation downloading people's dreams, and selling them as prurient entertainment.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="max-headroom-garage.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/10/max-headroom-garage.jpg" width="300" height="250" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>The cleverness of <em>Max Headroom</em> is reflected best in the origin story of the title character. Edison Carter, played by Frewer, is the star reporter at Network 23. While investigating a story, he's chased by some bad guys, and tries to escape by hopping on a motorcycle and exiting an underground parking garage.</p>

<p>But he ends up going airborne, and crashing headfirst into an exit-gate barrier, on which is printed the warning, "MAX. HEADROOM 2.3 METERS."</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="max-headroom-sign.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/10/max-headroom-sign.jpg" width="300" height="100" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; padding: 0 0 5px 10px;"/></span>

<p>When a computer genius back at Network 23 downloads Edison's brain into a computer program, what's left of the reporter's consciousness is represented by his disembodied face -- displayed by computer in a plastic, stuttering form. But Edison's memories are intact, including the last thing he saw, which becomes his computerized alter ego's name: Max Headroom.</p>

<p>Utterly brilliant. Especially since, as one of the show's creators explains on the disc of extras, every car park in England at the time was emblazoned with the identical "MAX HEADROOM" warning. Free, instant advertising, all over the nation. (It's a wonder no American series has ever claimed the title STOP, or YIELD, or WATCH FOR FALLING ROCK.)</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="max-headroom-on-tv.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/10/max-headroom-on-tv.jpg" width="300" height="200" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>I loved <em>Max Headroom</em> decades ago, reviewed it positively, and have taught it in my Rowan University TV History and Appreciation II class, quite recently, to the amusement and amazement of my students. Therefore, my only complaint about this first-ever DVD release is that it's not as complete an experience, or a history, as it could have been.</p>

<p>Yes, it's titled <em>Max Headroom: The Complete Series</em>, but that refers only to the ABC series, the live-action drama starring Frewer, Tambor, Amanda Pays, Morgan Sheppard, Concetta Tomei, Chris Young, Jere Burns and others.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="max-headroom-coke.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/10/max-headroom-coke.jpg" width="250" height="188" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>Missing from this set is the rest of the Max Headroom experience. Like what? Like this: His popular stint as a music-video host, which included Max interviewing such popular (and impressively game) stars as Sting. The original British Max Headroom telemovie, which was slightly re-edited, with a few supporting cast changes, into the ABC pilot. (These two showed up, eventually, on HBO and its sister network, Cinemax.) And even a few of his Coke commercials, which is where many people may have encountered him first.</p>

<p>The absence of these extra elements keeps this DVD <em>Max Headroom</em> set from being entirely complete -- but doesn't stop it from being impressive. So buy it, and enjoy it. As Max might say, it's f-f-fantastic.</p>

<p>(After about 5 p.m. Tuesday, you should be able to hear my review of the <em>Max Headroom</em> DVD set on NPR's <em>Fresh Air with Terry Gross</em> by clicking <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/rundowns/rundown.php?prgId=13">HERE.</a> Or Wednesday for sure.)</p>

<p>[UPDATE: Here's a bonus, if I've worked this right. I found, on YouTube, Max Headroom's 1985 interview with Sting, which is every bit as twisted and entertaining as I remembered. The clip is, I hope, embedded below. -- David B.]</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wAumSpIz0Kc?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The New TV Season: On Broadcast TV, Not Much Fresh TV Worth Watching</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/the-new-tv-season-on-broadcast.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.tvworthwatching.com,2010:/blog//1.2358</id>

    <published>2010-08-05T14:00:46Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-05T14:14:08Z</updated>

    <summary>Next month -- by which time this site will be in its newly redesigned incarnation -- we&apos;ll roll out a fall preview feature in which all our critics can weigh in on the new broadcast slate. Meanwhile, a handful of critics, myself included, were interviewed by Broadcasting &amp; Cable for a sneak preview. The general consensus: Fall 2010, for broadcast TV, presents a disappointingly ho-hum roster of new shows...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Bianculli</name>
        <uri>http://www.tvworthwatching.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="e-g-marshall-the-defenders-.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/05/e-g-marshall-the-defenders-.jpg" width="420" height="300" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>Next month -- by which time this site will be in its newly redesigned incarnation -- we'll roll out a fall preview feature in which all our critics can weigh in on the new broadcast slate. Meanwhile, a handful of critics, myself included, were interviewed by <em>Broadcasting & Cable</em> for a sneak preview. The general consensus: Fall 2010, for broadcast TV, presents a disappointingly ho-hum roster of new shows...</p>

<p>Marisa Guthrie, my former colleague at both <em>Broadcasting & Cable</em> and the New York Daily News, has gathered a critics' roundtable in years past, but this year she interviewed us individually. So until the article came out, I had no idea of my opinions meshed, for the most part, with my respected cohorts in criticism: Matt Roush of <em>TV Guide</em>, Robert Bianco of <em>USA Today</em>, Brian Lowry of <em>Variety</em>, Ellen Gray of the <em>Philadelphia Daily News</em> and Maureen Ryan of the <em>Chicago Tribune.</em></p>

<p>They did. The new season, on broadcast TV, provides very little about which to get excited.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="defenders-new.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/05/defenders-new.jpg" width="250" height="200" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>Even the retreads are infuriating. How dare CBS take a new, lighthearted legal show starring Jim Belushi and Jerry O'Connell, shown here, and title it <em>The Defenders</em>? That's the name of one of the most respected and revered courtroom dramas in TV history -- the controversial 1961-65 series starring E.G. Marshall and a pre-Brady Bunch Robert Reed (seen at the top of this column).</p>

<p>Recycling that series' title for a tossaway piece of pap, for those of us old enough to treasure the memory of the original show, is astoundingly insulting.</p>

<p>Why not just take a multi-generational sitcom and call it <em>All in the Family</em>? Or do a comedy about newlyweds and call it <em>The Honeymooners</em>? Why not launch a cooking show devoted entirely to the potato and title it <em>M*A*S*H</em>?</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="hawaii-five-0-top.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/05/hawaii-five-0-top.jpg" width="300" height="201" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>And why bother to remake <em>Hawaii Five-O,</em> as CBS is doing (shown here) if you botch the instrumental theme with a less powerful musical version?</p>

<p>Aaaaarrrghhhhh!!!</p>

<p>But I digress. </p>

<p>Below is a link to the original article, where you can read our early reactions to such things as William Shatner in CBS's <em>$#*! My Dad Says</em> ("an abominable show," says Bianco), J.J. Abrams' new <em>Undercovers</em> spy series ("just didn't do it for me," says Gray), and Fox's oil-magnates drama <em>Lone Star</em> ("made me wonder what would happen next," says Roush).</p>

<p>And thanks, Marisa, for keeping me as part of the pack. Read her article <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/455194-2010_Critics_Roundtable.php">HERE.</a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>News from the 2010 Summer TCA Press Tour -- From Some Favorite Colleagues </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/news-from-the-2010-summer-tca.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.tvworthwatching.com,2010:/blog//1.1699</id>

    <published>2010-08-01T04:30:28Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-02T04:48:00Z</updated>

    <summary>I&apos;m not at this summer&apos;s Television Critics Association press tour, but already, the tour has generated news in both an unexpected executive shift and in the annual awards bestowed upon TV shows and talent by the TCA itself. So today I&apos;m steering TV WORTH WATCHING readers towards reports from the tour by two veteran writers and, I&apos;m proud to say, members of this website&apos;s still-widening roster.

One is Canada&apos;s Bill Brioux, one of the first TV writers to join me on this site. The other is Ed Bark, one of the few working critics whose tenure predates my own -- and who, while operating his own website and continuing to freelance elsewhere, has agreed to join our merry band as well...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Bianculli</name>
        <uri>http://www.tvworthwatching.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
I'm not at this summer's Television Critics Association press tour, but already, the tour has generated news in both an unexpected executive shift and in the annual awards bestowed upon TV shows and talent by the TCA itself. So today I'm steering TV WORTH WATCHING readers towards reports from the tour by two veteran writers and, I'm proud to say, members of this website's still-widening roster.</p>

<p>One is Canada's Bill Brioux, one of the first TV writers to join me on this site. The other is Ed Bark, one of the few working critics whose tenure predates my own -- and who, while operating his own website and continuing to freelance elsewhere, has agreed to join our merry band as well...</p>

<p>It's a real treat to make room for Ed -- who, while on tour, is reporting exclusively for <a href="http://www.locatetv.com/">LocateTV.com. </a>So to give an advance taste, here's a link to Ed's report on the TCA Awards -- which includes, thanks to Ed's usually persistent and accurate reporting, some news about Tom Hanks' next TV project, as well as some hilarious quotes from <em>Lost</em> executive producer Damon Lindelof.</p>

<p>Read his Locate TV account, and get a taste of Ed's writing style, by clicking <a href="http://www.locatetv.com/blog/glee-cleans-up-other-recipients-score-points-by-talking-a-little-dirty-at-tv-critics-association-awards/">HERE</a>.</p>

<p>Bill Brioux, too, filed a report on the TCA Awards, for his entertaining website, <a href="http://tvfeedsmyfamily.blogspot.com/">TV Feeds My Family</a>. You can catch his story by clicking <a href="http://tvfeedsmyfamily.blogspot.com/2010/08/glee-reigns-supreme-at-tca-awards.html">HERE </a> -- and revel in even MORE hilarious quotes from Hanks and Lindelof. And more.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="paul-lee.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/02/paul-lee.jpg" width="200" height="266" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>And Bill, in his very next posting for TV Feeds My Family, covered ABC's handling of the sudden executive shift from Entertainment President Stephen McPherson (whose abrupt departure from his post occurred just as the TCA Tour began) to his replacement, Paul Lee (shown at left).</p>

<p>I was excited to hear about this, because Lee, who has spent the last several years at ABC Family turning out successful series for tweens, previously was the programming executive who launched BBC America, and, among other things, thus brought the original <em>Office</em> to American shores. I've spent a little time with Lee over the years talking TV and such -- not much, but enough to assess him as both tasteful and genuine, and a welcome addition to the broadcast TV ranks when taste and vision are in woefully short supply.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="pink-elephant-tca.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/08/02/pink-elephant-tca.jpg" width="300" height="430" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>Bill's story on how ABC introduced Lee to critics, and swept McPherson under the rug like revisionist party historians after the Russian revolution, is a great read. Disney/ABC executive VP Kevin Brockman dealt with the elephant in the room by bringing one -- a big, stuffed pink one.</p>

<p>Rather than reproduce Bill's press tour report on Lee here, as Bill has permitted, I'll steer you towards his website to read it for yourself. <a href="http://tvfeedsmyfamily.blogspot.com/2010/08/abc-makes-short-work-of-elephant-in.html">HERE</a> it is.</p>

<p>Welcome to ABC, Paul Lee. Welcome to TVWW, Ed Bark. And welcome back, Bill Brioux...</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Watch AMC&apos;s &quot;Rubicon&quot; -- And Watch It CLOSELY!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/07/watch-amcs-rubicon-and-watch-i.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.tvworthwatching.com,2010:/blog//1.1698</id>

    <published>2010-07-30T17:30:06Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-31T10:31:47Z</updated>

    <summary>Since AMC got into the one-hour drama series business, it&apos;s made one masterpiece after another. One was &quot;Mad Men,&quot; the other was &quot;Breaking Bad,&quot; and both are still on the air. Starting Sunday night at 8 ET, they&apos;re joined by a third new series, a modern-day spy thriller called &quot;Rubicon.&quot; Is it another TV triumph? Too early to tell. A TV show that should be watched? Most definitely... and very, very closely.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>David Bianculli</name>
        <uri>http://www.tvworthwatching.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
Save</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="rubicon-pilot-5-13-top.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/07/30/rubicon-pilot-5-13-top.jpg" width="420" height="200" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>Since AMC got into the one-hour drama series business, it's made one masterpiece after another. One was <em>Mad Men</em>, the other was <em>Breaking Bad</em>, and both are still on the air. Starting Sunday night at 8 ET, they're joined by a third new series, a modern-day spy thriller called <em>Rubicon.</em> Is it another TV triumph? Too early to tell. A TV show that should be watched? Most definitely... and very, very closely.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="rubicon-pilot-4-string.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/07/30/rubicon-pilot-4-string.jpg" width="250" height="250" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p><em>Rubicon</em> is the story about spies at an American agency that takes all the information gathered by other agencies and tries to make sense of if all. The central characters in this drama are uber-geeks -- the kind of spies who read books on string theory during their off hours, and find hidden meanings in the replication of clues in independently published crossword puzzles.</p>

<p>I've seen the first four hours of <em>Rubicon</em>, which was created by Jason Horwitch and is executive produced by Henry Bromell. (Bromell has a career's worth of impressive TV credits, including <em>Homicide: Life on the Street, Chicago Hope </em>and <em>I'll Fly Away.)</em></p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="threedaysofthecondor_redfor.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/07/30/threedaysofthecondor_redfor.jpg" width="170" height="135" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>Two of those hours are shown Sunday from 8-10 p.m. ET -- and by the time they're over, you'll get a feel for the show and its aims. It's a conspiracy-paranoia brain twister -- a drama that, as its creators freely admit, was inspired by, and intended to evoke, such vintage conspiracy movie thrillers as <em>All the President's Men, Three Days of the Condor</em> (left) and <em>The Parallax View.</em></p>

<p>Those are three of my favorite films from that era, and <em>Rubicon</em> evokes the same "trust no on<em>e" feeling nicely. The most notable difference is the pace: After four hours, I'm still not sure where </em>Rubicon is going, much less whether the destination will be worthwhile. But it's a show that keeps you thinking, and guessing -- and one that demands your full attention as well as a hearty supply of patience.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="rubicon-pilot-2-clover.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/07/30/rubicon-pilot-2-clover.jpg" width="150" height="150" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; padding: 0 0 5px 10px;"/></span>

<p>I can't say this clearly enough: You cannot watch <em>Rubicon</em> casually and expect to follow it, much less enjoy it.</p>

<p>Unlike so much of what passes for TV drama these days, it is not a show that rewards or tolerates multi-tasking. Watch <em>Rubicon</em>, and watch it attentively -- or don't bother watching it at all.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="rubicon-pilot-1-running-sno.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/07/30/rubicon-pilot-1-running-sno.jpg" width="250" height="142" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>Otherwise, if you're doing the bills, or the dishes, or reading the paper (hah: like that still happens!), you'll miss too much.</p>

<p>Like, for example, the four-leaf clover that pops up as a menacing, unexplained harbinger of doom.  Or the number "13" that pops up not only as an important numbered spot in a parking lot (see photo at top of column), but as the very first word spoken in this series, yelled as part of a hide-and-go-seek countdown as a young boy runs in the snow.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="rubicon-pilot-6-puzzle-patt.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/07/30/rubicon-pilot-6-puzzle-patt.jpg" width="300" height="175" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p><em>Rubicon</em> stars James Badge Dale, who played Leckie on HBO's <em>The Pacific,</em> as Will Travers, the string-theory-reading loner at the New York-based intelligence analysis agency, innocuously named the American Policy Institute. His boss, the only person at API to whom he relates, is David Hadas, played by wonderful character actor Peter Gerety. Early on, Will takes his puzzling crossword-puzzle discovery to David, which sets a whole round of even more mysterious moves and counter-moves into action.</p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="tinkertailor.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/07/30/tinkertailor.jpg" width="225" height="295" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p>But action, really, may be too strong a word. <em>Rubicon</em>, at least in the first four hours, is more obsessed with mood than with mayhem. Characters count more than carnage. To find the closest equivalent in a previous TV spy drama, you have to go all the way back to that classic Alec Guinness vehicle, the imported 1979 miniseries brilliantly dramatizing John Le Carre's <em>Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy.</em></p>

<p>Time, and future episodes, will tell whether <em>Rubicon</em> earns that comparison more fully -- and deserves the heaps of praise duly bestowed upon <em>Mad Men</em> and <em>Breaking Bad,</em> rather than the equally duly bestowed disappointment heaped upon AMC's misfire of a miniseries remake of another classic paranoia spy drama, <em>The Prisoner.</em></p>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="rubicon-1.jpg" src="http://www.tvworthwatching.com/blog/2010/07/30/rubicon-1.jpg" width="300" height="195" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; padding: 0 10px 5px 0;"/></span>

<p><em>Rubicon</em> is a big risk for AMC, because many viewers will give up on it early because too little is explained or resolved. (Running the first two hours as a double-header is a clever move.) But <em>Rubicon</em>, also, is a smart risk, and a smart show -- AMC, right now, is as interested in building reputation as viewership. And <em>Rubicon</em>, when the jigsaw puzzle is more complete, may well turn out to be another key piece.</p>

<p>If you can't wait until Sunday night, AMC, which already has sneak previewed episode one a few times on its own network (after the season finale of <em>Breaking Bad</em> and the season premiere of <em>Mad Men</em>), is making the first hour available immediately on its website. Watch, if you wish, by clicking <a href="http://www.amctv.com/originals/Rubicon">HERE.</a></p>

<p>And while I'm offering links to elsewhere, here's a link to audio and text of my radio review of <em>Rubicon</em> for NPR's <em>Fresh Air with Terry Gross,</em> which ran Wednesday. Read that, and listen, by clicking <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128794048">HERE.</a> (Or, if you're listening to <em>Fresh Air Weekend</em> this weekend, the review is being repeated there, too. Check, as they say, your local listings.)</p>

<p>Either way, please return with your reactions once you've seen an hour, or two, or four, or more. The TV WORTH WATCHING readership is PRECISELY the target audience for <em>Rubicon</em> -- so I'm interested in whether these guys have hit their mark. And, no doubt, so are they...</p>

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
 </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
