TV Worth Watching logo
Bianculli's blog

GUEST BLOG #64: Diane Holloway thinks 'Good Wife' makes great TV


[Bianculli here: Contributing critic Diane Holloway gives The Good Wife a good review -- so good that she calls the CBS drama series "the good news of the fall season"...]

good wife margulies cbs.jpg

'The Good Wife' is good news for viewers

By Diane Holloway

As far as I'm concerned, The Good Wife is the good news of the fall TV season -- a quality drama that started with a strong pilot and lived up to its promise.

There is nothing more disappointing than a good pilot that turns into a lousy series. It happens. But it didn't happen this time.

In large part, the success of The Good Wife (Tuesday at 10 p.m. ET, CBS) comes from the powerful yet subtle performance of Julianna Margulies as attorney Alicia Florrick, a woman painfully and publicly humiliated by her politician husband Peter (Chris Noth).

good wife margulies noth.jpg

But the strength of the CBS drama also stems from exceptional writing (by married writers Robert King and Michelle King) that gives us compelling legal cases each week, along with an ongoing mystery about the sex scandal that sent Alicia's husband to prison. It will be interesting to see how long the mystery can be maintained. Either Peter was set up by political enemies, or he wasn't. If he was, who did it?

But as David Letterman said after revelations of his hanky panky emerged, Peter has a lot of work to do in his marriage. Alicia has resumed her career and seems to have moved on emotionally, although watching old family movies can pluck at her heartstrings. Betrayal is a bitter pill to swallow.

When CBS was promoting The Good Wife before its debut, the concept looked like a ripped-from-the-headlines effort. Wronged political wives and tainted politicians were popping up all over the news. Gov. Mark Sanford, former Gov. Eliot Spitzer and former Sen. John Edwards triggered salacious coverage. The real-life wives soldiered on, grim-faced with resolve on the outside, but undoubtedly shattered on the inside.

good wife courthouse.jpg

The fictional version portrayed by Margulies comes across as painfully accurate. But as the series has continued, she has gone from shell-shocked to steely -- with a dose of vulnerability tossed in.

After slapping her husband's face in the pilot following his excruciating press conference (I cheered when she did that, didn't you?), Alicia stomped off in her tasteful suit and high heels to revive her career as a high-powered attorney. Peter went to prison for abuse of power. We did not know then and we do not know now (for sure) if they will reconcile. She is a proud woman, and she has been scorned. She won't come back easily, if she comes back at all.

The political and marital corruption are subplots, however. The Good Wife is primarily a legal drama, which means the episodes focus on each week's case. So far, the courtroom stories have been unusual and riveting. In a recent episode, Alicia was paired with a young storefront lawyer who impressed her with his skill and idealism. The typical story arc would have found the young legal eagle returning as a potential love interest. But at the end of the hour, we were surprised, along with Alicia, to find out the man was an imposter. He never went to law school or passed the bar. He was a fake. And Alicia was duped again.

good wife baranski.jpg

The writers have much to explore in the law office characters. We know very little about the haughty but slightly insecure law partner Diane Lockhart, played by Christine Baranski. There would be no point in casting someone of Baranski's considerable skills without giving her some meaty stuff, so we've got that to look forward to.

In fact, everything about The Good Wife is bursting with promise. It's my new appointment TV. And I can't wait to see what happens next.

8 Comments

Ed Q said:

While I do agree the show has lived up to the promise shown in the pilot, one issue I can not get past is the locations utilized in shooting. It is disturbing to see a show allegedly based in Chicago so blatantly shot in New York City. The Queens Civil & Supreme Courts have been in virtually every episode which I could handle if they did a better job hiding the "New York" in the background but they simply don't. They have made the city a frequent character and it's hurting the quality of the program. Maybe it's my locality as a Queens resident it's gone from novel to annoying and I wish they'd do a little more Second City than Big Apple.

Comment posted on November 17, 2009 11:16 AM
Doug Potter said:

Diane!

Here's another hour of my life taken up by entertainment. I watched the pilot because of Julianna Margulies after a promo for it revived the bitterness I felt when Canterbury's Law was canceled. After ER I discovered that I had had enough of ER, but not enough of Julianna.
After watching The Good Wife I thought, " That was okay, but not enough to get me to watch more." Then the week went by and I started thinking about it and here I am in full agreement with your analysis of the show.
Sigh*

Comment posted on November 17, 2009 12:15 PM

I've been enjoying this series, too. I first tuned in because I just have a strange feeling of good will toward Julianna Margulies. But I've been coming back to it because I've enjoyed how well the whole thing's playing out.

Comment posted on November 17, 2009 12:32 PM
Terry said:

"... we were surprised, along with Alicia, to find out the man was an imposter. He never went to law school or passed the bar. He was a fake."

Wrong. It was clearly stated that he graduated from law school, but never passed the bar exam.

Comment posted on November 17, 2009 1:29 PM
stefanie said:

I agree!I didn't even realize how much I was liking the show until it was off the air during the world series, and I had nothing good to watch. But I'm kind of hooked.

My only complaint about this show (and pretty much ALL network shows except Friday Night Lights) is that no one, even a woman with two private school tuitions and an impending divorce, ever has a single money worry. Even if they were wealthy, especially if they were wealthy, there would be some tightening of the purse for lawyer fees during this time. It always seems such a stupid thing for the writers to do, since lack of money can serve as many kinds of motivation for characters. That, and it feels real.

I am especially pleased to see Josh Charles back on a show. I have always thought he had oodles of screen charisma, and have never understood why he didn't work more. His work on the first season of In Treatment was stupendous.

And thank you for this blog. I have two small children and never know when anything is on anymore.

I check this site daily to see what I would otherwise miss.

Comment posted on November 17, 2009 3:34 PM
elise said:

Save a seat for me... I'll be right there with ya!

Comment posted on November 17, 2009 5:21 PM
kevin said:

My one issue with the show is it has people rooting for Divorce. They are steering Alicia towards the Josh Charles character. At some point they are going to make Josh Charles, Noth or Margulies extermely unlikable. Given the Noth character's backstory he would be the easiest but Noth is doing a good job of playing a good guy who did some bad stuff, not a complete dirtbag.

I have the same issue with Glee which has made Will's wife totally unlikable already, and is pushing the viewer to root for divorce.

Not that characters can't divorce but it is very dark to start out that way.

Comment posted on November 19, 2009 9:46 AM
Esther said:

I agree. This is my favorite thing to watch on TV right now!

Comment posted on December 3, 2009 6:11 PM

Leave a comment